Decoupling Layer Armor Plate for Ballistic Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective elements for vehicles and other objects against military threats face challenges in providing effective protection against both armor-piercing ammunition and splinters, as materials like ceramics or ultra-hard armor steel are brittle and easily penetrated by splinters, while softer materials that protect against splinters weaken the defense against armor-piercing ammunition, leading to complex and heavy constructions.

Innovation Solution

A protective element arrangement featuring a decoupling layer on the threat side that allows armor-piercing ammunition to penetrate undisturbed while absorbing and decoupling the shock wave from splinters, using a softer material like non-foamed polyurethane with a Shore hardness of 70 to 95, applied directly to the armor steel plate, which is designed to be the hardest layer, and optionally covered with a protective layer for added resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If harder materials like ceramics or ultra-hard armor steel are used, then protection against armor-piercing ammunition is improved, but protection against splinters deteriorates due to brittleness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against armor-piercing ammunitionVSAvoidprotection against splinters
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective element is divided into multiple functional layers: a hard armor plate layer for stopping armor-piercing ammunition and a softer decoupling layer for protecting against splinters. This segmentation allows each layer to specialize in countering specific threats without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective element combines different materials with complementary properties - ultra-hard armor steel or ceramics for penetrating resistance and softer high-tensile materials like aramid or polyethylene for splinter protection. This composite structure achieves multi-threat protection that neither material could provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If softer materials like aramid fabric or polyethylene liners are used, then protection against splinters is improved, but protection against armor-piercing ammunition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against splintersVSAvoidprotection against armor-piercing ammunition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The protective element is divided into multiple functional layers: a hard armor plate layer for stopping armor-piercing ammunition and a softer decoupling layer for protecting against splinters. This segmentation allows each layer to specialize in countering specific threats without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective element combines different materials with complementary properties - ultra-hard armor steel or ceramics for penetrating resistance and softer high-tensile materials like aramid or polyethylene for splinter protection. This composite structure achieves multi-threat protection that neither material could provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If multi-layered sandwich structures are used, then protection against both armor-piercing ammunition and splinters is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against both threatsVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoupling layer is applied directly to the armor plate surface, merging the splinter protection function into the armor plate assembly itself. This integration reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall structure while maintaining dual-threat protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The decoupling layer is implemented as a thin film or coating applied directly to the armor plate, rather than as thick discrete layers. This approach provides effective splinter protection while minimizing added complexity and weight compared to traditional multi-layer sandwich structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances protection against both armor-piercing ammunition and splinters with a simpler, lighter construction by decoupling the impact, reducing the risk of the armor plate being penetrated and providing effective resistance without significant weight increase, while maintaining high hardness against armor-piercing projectiles.

Implementation Method 1

If a splinter hits the decoupling layer over a large area, a shock wave results, which is introduced by the splinter into the armor plate via the decoupling layer. Since the shock wave propagates within the decoupling layer faster than the fragment penetrates the decoupling layer, the shock wave precedes the penetrating fragment in the direction of the armor plate behind it.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

As a result, the impact acting on the armor plate and the fragment striking the armor plate after penetrating the decoupling layer are decoupled from one another. The resistance of the protective element is thereby increased with simple means in such a way that both armor-piercing ammunition and fragments are held off in a simple manner.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecoupling:

Data Source

PatentEP3055639B1Protection element with a decoupling layer
Publication Date: 2019.12.11 KRAUSS MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3055639B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3055639B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3055639B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a protection element for protecting an object from military threats, having an armour plate (2) with a threat side (3) facing a threat and an object side (4) facing the object being protected, a decoupling layer (5) being arranged on the threat side (3) to decouple the impact of a blow on the armour plate in the event of a ballistic strike from the impact of the ballistic object itself on the armour plate.