Decoupling Reward Rules From Booster Definitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recognition and reward systems face challenges in scalability and user participation due to complex configurations and the need for tight coupling between reward rules and rewards, leading to manual integration burdens and limited incentive effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A communications platform that employs unique data structures and a rules engine to abstract the definition of rewards from the rules for determining when they are available, allowing boosters and administrators to interface directly without needing to define or be aware of each other's components, thus decoupling rewards from rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual integration of booster rewards is used, then flexibility in reward offering is improved, but administrative burden and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in reward offeringVSAvoidadministrative burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (the recognition and reward platform with automated integration capabilities) that mediates between boosters and the reward distribution process. This intermediary handles the automated matching of booster offerings with student achievements, eliminating manual administrative work while preserving booster flexibility in defining their own rewards and criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the reward integration process into independent modular components: booster reward definitions, student achievement tracking, automated matching logic, and reward distribution. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently, reducing administrative burden while maintaining overall system flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If tight coupling between rules and rewards is implemented, then system control is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of configuration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by separating the rules engine (which defines achievement criteria) from the rewards database (which stores booster offerings). This creates a modular architecture where rules and rewards are independently configurable yet systematically connected through automated integration, reducing configuration complexity while maintaining control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal interface layer that allows different types of rules and rewards to be integrated through common protocols. This universal integration mechanism maintains systematic control over reward distribution while allowing flexible configuration of specific rules and rewards without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If specialized computing configurations are required, then system functionality is improved, but ease of use and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal platform architecture that can operate across diverse computing environments without requiring specialized configurations. The system provides standardized interfaces and adaptive capabilities that allow it to function effectively on various hardware and software platforms, improving ease of use and scalability while maintaining full functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11481794B2Communications platform for linking rules with independently defined rewards
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 REDCRITTER CORP
  • US11481794B2 patent drawing
  • US11481794B2 patent drawing
  • US11481794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

As part of implementing a recognition and reward system, a communications platform can employ a unique set of data structures, APIs and a rules engine that abstract the definition of rewards from the definition of rules for determining when the rewards should be made available. Accordingly, boosters may interface directly with the communications platform to offer rewards to participants but need not be aware of or involved in the process of defining the rules that will be used to distribute the rewards. Likewise, administrators may interface directly with the communications platform to define rules for making rewards available without needing to be aware of the rewards themselves. In this way, a communications platform can integrate boosters and their rewards into a recognition and rewards system without requiring tight coupling between the rules for determining when rewards should be made available and the rewards themselves.