DECT Airway Wall Abnormality Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical evaluation of airway abnormalities in pulmonary diseases relies on subjective visual inspection and lacks automation for distinguishing between thickened airway walls due to inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes, making it difficult for physicians to differentiate potentially treatable inflammatory thickening from non-inflammatory scarring.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for visualizing airway wall abnormalities using Multi-Planar Reconstruction from Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) imaging data, providing semi-transparent overlays and color indicators to differentiate between thickened walls with and without inflammation, allowing for interactive displays to identify normal, thickened, inflamed, or both conditions in the bronchial tree.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated methods are used to extract and model the airway tree for measuring wall thickness, then measurement precision is improved, but the ability to distinguish between inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairway wall thickness measurementVSAvoidinflammation differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The airway evaluation is segmented into two independent analysis streams: one for geometric measurements (wall thickness, lumen size) and another for tissue characterization (inflammation detection via iodine uptake). This allows both precise measurements and inflammation differentiation to be maintained simultaneously without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from single-energy CT to dual-energy CT imaging, which provides additional material decomposition parameters. This enables the system to detect both geometric dimensions and iodine uptake (inflammation marker) from the same imaging data, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If dual energy CT imaging is used to detect iodine uptake for inflammation identification, then diagnostic information is improved, but image processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinflammation detection capabilityVSAvoidimage processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-energy CT data is processed in advance to generate pre-computed maps (iodine uptake maps, virtual non-contrast images) before the diagnostic review. This preliminary processing reduces the complexity during the actual diagnostic phase, as the inflammation information is already extracted and ready for interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that automatically generates quantitative maps and overlays from raw dual-energy CT data. This intermediary layer handles the complex material decomposition and iodine quantification, presenting simplified visual results to the radiologist and reducing perceived system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If 3D visualizations with color coding are used to depict airway abnormalities, then ease of operation is improved, but the distinction between different types of thickening becomes less clear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairway evaluation efficiencyVSAvoidthickening type differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The visualization system applies different color codes to different airway wall conditions: one color scheme for wall thickness abnormalities and another for inflammation presence. This local differentiation allows the radiologist to quickly identify both the location and type of abnormality (thickened vs. inflamed) simultaneously, maintaining information distinction while improving evaluation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from 2D axial views to 3D volume rendering with color-coded overlays, adding a visual dimension that encodes multiple parameters (thickness, inflammation) simultaneously. This dimensional enhancement allows rapid spatial assessment while preserving detailed diagnostic information through color differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid identification and differentiation of airway wall abnormalities, enabling physicians to distinguish between treatable inflammatory and non-inflammatory thickening, improving patient treatment individualization by providing objective visual indicators of disease severity and distribution.

Implementation Method 1

Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) imaging data acquired from the patient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-Ray absorption: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

some airway walls in patients with airway disease experience iodine uptake following the administration of intravenous iodinated contrast. This iodine uptake in bronchial walls is believed to be caused by an increase in local blood flow, which in turn is caused by inflammation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIodine uptake: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP3147862B1Visualizing different types of airway wall abnormalities
Publication Date: 2019.11.06 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
  • EP3147862B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3147862B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3147862B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for visualizing airway wall abnormalities includes acquiring \Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) imaging data comprising one or more image volumes representative of a bronchial tree. An iodine map is derived using the DECT imaging data and the bronchial tree is segmented from the image volume(s). A tree model representative of the bronchial tree is generated. Then, for each branch, this tree model is used to determine an indicator of normal or abnormal thickness. Locations corresponding to bronchial walls in the bronchial tree using the tree model are identified. Next, for each branch, the locations corresponding to bronchial walls in the bronchial tree and the iodine map are used to determine an indicator of normal or abnormal inflammation. A visualization of the bronchial tree may be presented with visual indicators at each of the locations corresponding to bronchial walls indicating whether a bronchial wall is thickened and/or inflamed.