DED Focused Power Control for Energy Runaway Interruption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The additive manufacturing process of titanium parts using Directed Energy Deposition (DED) faces challenges with uncontrolled energy surges, known as 'flash,' which lead to destruction of the titanium bead and surrounding structure, making it difficult to implement in serial part manufacturing due to high energy levels per unit area and random energy runaway phenomena.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where the manufacturing process is momentarily shut down when the intensity of the control current exceeds a given threshold, and resumed when it falls below this threshold, with simultaneous deactivation of the focused energy source and material supply system to prevent energy runaway.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high energy levels per unit area are used for material deposition, then deposition speed and productivity are improved, but energy runaway phenomenon occurs causing destruction of the titanium bead and surrounding structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition speedVSAvoidenergy runaway
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism by continuously monitoring the control current intensity of the focused energy source and automatically adjusting the deposition process. When the control current exceeds a predetermined threshold, the system temporarily suspends the deposition process, preventing energy runaway while maintaining high productivity during normal operation. This closed-loop control ensures safe operating conditions are maintained without significantly reducing overall deposition speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If continuous deposition process is maintained to ensure manufacturing continuity, then productivity is improved, but random energy runaway phenomena cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing continuityVSAvoidprocess control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors control current intensity and provides real-time feedback to the control mechanism. When energy levels approach dangerous thresholds, the feedback loop automatically triggers process suspension, preventing energy runaway while minimizing interruption to manufacturing continuity. The process can quickly resume after threshold conditions clear, maintaining overall productivity while ensuring reliability through automated safety control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If control current intensity is increased to improve deposition efficiency, then productivity is improved, but the risk of energy runaway increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition efficiencyVSAvoidenergy runaway risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the control current intensity parameter based on real-time monitoring conditions. During normal deposition, high current levels are maintained for efficient material deposition. When the control current approaches predetermined threshold values, the system automatically reduces or suspends the current to prevent energy runaway. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to operate at high efficiency when safe, while automatically reducing risk when conditions deteriorate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the risk of energy runaway, allowing for controlled deposition of material layers and maintaining the expected characteristics of the titanium parts, ensuring the energy level per unit area remains within a safe range.

Implementation Method 1

melting a material using a focused energy source, such as a laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam melting: Laser

Implementation Method 2

an electron beam for example

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam melting: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

a control device configured to control an operating parameter of the focused energy source and to interrupt the manufacturing process when the intensity of the control current exceeds a predetermined threshold value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical current intensity measurement: Ohmmeter

Data Source

PatentEP4129560B1Additive manufacturing method using a focused power source, said method being controlled according to the intensity of a control current of said focused power source
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • EP4129560B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for manufacturing a part (14) by stacking layers of material (16), each obtained by continuously depositing and fusing a material (18) using an energy beam (22), at least one characteristic of which is controlled by the intensity of a control current. The manufacturing process comprises a step of monitoring the intensity of the control current, a step of comparing the monitored control current intensity with a given threshold, and a step of stopping the manufacturing process when the control current intensity exceeds the given threshold. This temporary stoppage of the process significantly reduces the risk of energy runaway that could destroy the deposited material bead and the surrounding structure.