U-Shaped Preforms for Deep-Blade Aircraft Thrust Reverser Grids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing grids of blades for aircraft thrust reversing devices result in high mass and energy consumption due to the complex geometry and difficulty in extracting blades with large depths using simple cores.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the production and assembly of U-shape preforms, each comprising a central part and branches forming longitudinal walls, allows for blades with large depths while using simple tooling by eliminating undercuts and ensuring structural integrity through compression and polymerization phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If traditional molding methods with cores are used to produce grids of blades, then the blades can be formed with required geometry, but the extraction of blades with large depths becomes difficult and requires complex sliding cores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade depthVSAvoidextraction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the grid of blades into multiple separable rows, where each row can be extracted independently from the mold. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex sliding cores to extract deep blade structures, as each row is removed separately through simplified extraction paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of forming the entire grid as a single monolithic structure that requires complex extraction, the invention inverts the approach by creating individual blade rows that can be easily removed. The mold design allows rows to be extracted in reverse sequence of insertion, simplifying the extraction mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If a large number of cells are included in the grid of blades to achieve the required geometry, then the functional performance is improved, but the mass of the structure increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional performanceVSAvoidgrid mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by varying the blade depth and cell structure in different regions of the grid. Blades with larger depths are positioned where maximum thrust reversal effect is needed, while areas requiring less functionality have reduced blade depths, optimizing the mass-performance ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses partial action by implementing blades with varying depths rather than uniform maximum depth throughout the entire grid. This allows the structure to achieve sufficient functional performance with reduced overall mass by applying blade depth only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Weight of moving object

If the blades are made with small depth to reduce mass, then the onboard mass is reduced, but the number of cells and overall complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveonboard massVSAvoidnumber of cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements local quality by varying blade depth according to functional requirements in different grid regions. This allows reduction of overall mass through selective use of deeper blades only where maximum thrust reversal effect is required, while other areas use shallower blades to reduce mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of blades with large depths, reducing mass and energy consumption, and simplifies the extraction process by using U-shape preforms with no undercuts, thus improving the efficiency and feasibility of manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

a consolidation or polymerization step to connect the first and second preforms together during which the assembly is compressed and subjected to an increase in temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

a consolidation or polymerization step to connect the first and second preforms together during which the assembly is compressed and subjected to an increase in temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 3

The rise in temperature causes expansion of the cores 52 which compress the second preforms 48′

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 4

After the consolidation or polymerization step the grid of blades 44 obtained and the cores 52 are cooled, which causes the cores 52 to shrink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS20250283439A1Method of obtaining a grid of blades of an aircraft thrust reversing device
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US20250283439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250283439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250283439A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of obtaining a grid of blades of an aircraft thrust reversing device by producing U-shape elements each including an integral central part corresponding to a blade and first and second branches each corresponding to at least a part of a longitudinal wall of the grid of blades and assembling which includes connecting the first branches of the various U-shape elements to one another in such a manner as to form a first longitudinal wall and connecting the second branches of the various U-shape elements to one another in such a manner as to form a second longitudinal wall.