Deep Hole Boring Head With Pilot Drill Bit for Titanium

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep hole boring tools are unsuitable for titanium materials due to titanium adhesion to guide pads, leading to seizure, high torque requirements, premature pad wear, and poor hole geometry, making it difficult to achieve accurate and rectifiable holes.

Innovation Solution

A deep hole boring head with a pilot drill bit for centering, eliminating the need for guide pads and allowing for sufficient torque with existing machines, and integral bronze pads for protecting the hole walls during removal, reducing material costs and improving hole geometry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If guide pads are used to guide the boring head, then the boring head can be guided during boring, but titanium adheres to the guide pads causing seizure and high torque requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance of boring headVSAvoidboring torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the guide pads from the boring head design. Instead of using external guide pads that contact the hole walls, the invention uses a pilot drill bit that centers the boring head before the cutting edges engage. This extraction of the problematic guide pads eliminates titanium adhesion and the associated high torque requirements while maintaining guidance functionality through the pilot bit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If guide pads are used to guide the boring head, then the boring head can be guided during boring, but the guide pads experience premature wear requiring frequent replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance of boring headVSAvoidservice life of guide pads
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the guide pads entirely from the design. The guidance function is transferred to a pilot drill bit that centers the boring head. This removal of the stationary guide pads eliminates their premature wear and the need for frequent replacement, while the pilot bit provides the necessary centering and guidance functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If guide pads are used to guide the boring head, then the boring head can be guided during boring, but the hole geometry becomes poor with significant deviations from the boring axis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance of boring headVSAvoidhole geometry accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a pilot drill bit that performs preliminary centering action before the main cutting edges engage. This preliminary action of the pilot bit establishes the correct boring axis and centers the boring head, ensuring accurate hole geometry. The pilot bit creates a pilot hole or establishes the center point, allowing subsequent cutting edges to follow the correct path, thereby eliminating deviations from the boring axis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If guide pads are used to guide the boring head, then the boring head can be guided during boring, but carbide particles from the guide pads contaminate subsequent machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance of boring headVSAvoidcarbide particle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the guide pads that are made of carbide or similar hard materials. By eliminating these guide pads, the source of carbide particle contamination is removed. The guidance function is instead performed by a pilot drill bit that does not generate harmful particles, thus preventing contamination of subsequent machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Device complexity

If conventional boring head design is used, then the structure is simple, but it becomes impossible to develop sufficient boring torque to continue rotating the head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboring head structureVSAvoidboring torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the boring head into distinct functional components: a pilot drill bit for centering, cutting edges for material removal, and bronze pads for protection during removal. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently. The pilot bit handles guidance and centering, reducing the torque burden on the main cutting edges, thereby enabling sufficient boring torque to be developed without overcomplicating the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7572088B2Deep hole boring head and deep hole boring method for boring a production piece
Publication Date: 2009.08.11 SAFRAN LANDING SYSTEMS
  • US7572088B2 patent drawing
  • US7572088B2 patent drawing
  • US7572088B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A deep hole boring head is provided which is capable of rotating about a central axis, a body whose front part has at least one cutting edge followed by a recess which leads to a duct inside the body, this duct allowing the chips formed during the boring to be cleared away rearwards, and includes at a front end thereof and at a center portion thereof a pilot drill bit capable of guiding the head during boring. Use for the boring of a production piece is made of titanium, the ratio L/D between the depth L of the hole bored and the diameter D of the latter being greater than or equal to 10, and the diameter D being greater than or equal to 65 mm.