Deep Learning Framework for 5G Network Design Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

5G network design and optimization face significant complexity due to coexistence of 4G and 5G technologies, along with legacy networks, and existing approaches are limited in addressing multiple optimization problems across various scenarios, particularly for air-to-ground communications which require tailored antenna designs and deployment configurations to ensure broadband connectivity for aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning-based framework using double deep neural networks (DNNs) to model and optimize 5G network behavior, allowing for joint optimization of parameters such as antenna beam tilt, inter-site distance, and number of sectors, enabling efficient deployment and operation of complex networks like air-to-ground systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional network design approaches are used for 5G networks, then the design process becomes manageable with conventional methods, but the network cannot effectively address multiple optimization problems across various scenarios including air-to-ground communications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different deployment scenariosVSAvoidnetwork design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a unified deep learning framework that handles multiple network optimization problems across different scenarios (terrestrial and air-to-ground communications) using a single adaptable system. The framework uses shared neural network components that can be configured for various deployment scenarios, enabling one system to perform multiple optimization functions rather than requiring separate designs for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by employing deep neural networks that learn optimal network parameters (such as antenna beam tilt, inter-site distance, number of sectors) through training on simulation data. The framework adjusts these parameters dynamically based on the input scenario, transforming the design process from manual configuration to automated parameter optimization that adapts to different deployment conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If deep learning frameworks are used to optimize network parameters, then network performance metrics such as user throughput and coverage are improved, but the computational complexity and training requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training the deep neural networks using extensive system-level simulations to generate training datasets. The framework performs offline training where the neural networks learn optimal parameter configurations for various scenarios before actual deployment. This preliminary training phase captures complex network behaviors, allowing the trained model to make rapid predictions during operation without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a virtual model of the network through neural networks that replicates complex network behaviors and performance characteristics. Instead of directly simulating the entire network for each optimization query, the framework uses trained neural network models that copy and approximate network responses, significantly reducing computational complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If extensive system-level simulations are conducted to train deep neural networks, then accurate prediction models are obtained, but the training time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by generating training datasets that cover the most critical and representative network scenarios rather than exhaustively simulating all possible configurations. The framework focuses computational resources on training for key deployment scenarios and parameter ranges, achieving sufficient prediction accuracy for practical purposes without the excessive computational burden of complete scenario coverage. This selective approach balances training comprehensiveness with resource constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12021709B2Network design and optimization using deep learning
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12021709B2 patent drawing
  • US12021709B2 patent drawing
  • US12021709B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for design and optimization of a network are described. A first deep neural network is used to obtain a function that represents a relationship between design parameters of the network and network performance metrics of the network. A second deep neural network is used to obtain a subset of one or more candidate network deployment configurations that optimize the performance metrics for the network. An optimal candidate network deployment configuration for the network is selected from the subset of candidate network deployment configurations wherein the optimal candidate network deployment configuration maximizes performance of the network as defined based on the performance metrics.