Deep-Learning Flood Simulation for Fast Hydrodynamic Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for simulating two-dimensional hydrodynamic flows, such as flood patterns, are computationally intensive and time-consuming, and lack accurate prediction capabilities, especially in both known and unknown geographical domains.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing deep learning neural networks for rapid simulation and prediction of dynamic flows, including a flood-prediction engine with modules for local and large-domain training, adaptive scaling, and probabilistic forecasting, enabling accurate and efficient flood simulations up to 10^6 times faster than traditional methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling approaches are used to compute accurate physically-based hydrodynamic modeling results, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to being labor, time, and computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of flood predictionVSAvoidcomputation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical computational system (solving shallow water equations numerically) with an artificial neural network system that has been trained to predict flood patterns. The neural network learns the complex hydrodynamic relationships from training data and then rapidly predicts flood behavior without requiring intensive numerical computations, achieving both accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training computations offline to build the neural network model. During actual flood prediction operations, the pre-trained network rapidly processes new inputs without requiring intensive real-time computations. This preliminary action transfers the computational burden from runtime to training time, improving operational productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling approaches are used to solve shallow water equations, then reliability is improved through physically-based modeling, but loss of time increases due to the multistep technical process being computationally lengthy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of flood simulationVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the time-intensive mechanical process of solving shallow water equations with a trained neural network that has learned hydrodynamic patterns. The neural network maintains physical accuracy by learning from physically-based training data while executing predictions in fractions of a second, eliminating the time loss associated with traditional numerical methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the computational parameters from solving differential equations step-by-step to using a pre-trained neural network model that has already optimized its parameters during training. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain physical accuracy while dramatically reducing computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If deep learning neural networks are used for rapid simulation and prediction of dynamic flows, then productivity is improved by being up to 10^6 times faster, but device complexity increases due to the need for training modules and adaptive scaling mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the flood prediction system into distinct functional modules: data preprocessing module, neural network training module, model deployment module, and result interpretation module. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture, making the complex neural network system more manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network system is designed with universal components that can handle multiple flood scenarios and geographic regions. The adaptive scaling mechanisms and transfer learning capabilities allow the same core system to be applied across different domains, reducing overall system complexity through reusability rather than requiring separate specialized systems for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If deep learning neural networks are used for rapid simulation, then loss of time is reduced by providing fast predictions, but use of energy increases due to computational requirements of training and inference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction timeVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs energy-intensive neural network training computations in advance during off-peak hours or using distributed computing resources. Once trained, the model requires minimal energy for rapid inference operations. This preliminary action shifts the energy burden from operational use to setup phase, reducing real-time energy consumption while maintaining fast prediction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements adaptive computation that allocates energy resources based on local needs and data availability. The system can operate in different modes (full training, fine-tuning, or inference-only) depending on the specific application context, optimizing energy usage locally rather than uniformly across all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260004029A1System and Method for Simulation of Multiple Dynamic Systems Involving Movement Over Time
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 DIVINING LAB LLC
  • US20260004029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004029A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for simulating multiple dynamic flows involving movement over time, for example, of water and other fluids, air or wind, fire, or the like, is disclosed. The system and method are a visualization and simulation platform designed to create and execute an approach using deep-learning, computer vision, image processing, and artificial intelligence for predicting all manners of dynamic physical motion over time. The visualization and simulation system is configured to quickly model and predict dynamical physical phenomena including, but not limited to, movement of water or air flow or fire in any topography. The visualization and simulation system predicts flooding behavior patterns in “known” geographical domains (regions and/or areas where the deep-learning system has been explicitly trained on) as well as “unknown” geographical domains (regions and/or areas where the deep-learning system has not been previously exposed or trained on) by providing time-dependent two-dimensional hydrodynamic flooding predictions.