Deep Learning Classifier for Immunotherapy Response Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current immunotherapy treatments using PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors have low response rates, high costs, and serious immune-mediated adverse events, necessitating more effective diagnostic tools to predict patient responses.

Innovation Solution

A multi-omic classifier is developed using deep learning analysis of imaging and clinical data, including diagnostic imaging scans, biomarkers, and clinical data to predict responses to PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade therapies in cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and breast cancer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors are used for immunotherapy treatment, then treatment coverage is expanded, but response rates remain low and adverse events increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment coverageVSAvoidresponse rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of imaging and clinical data before treatment to predict patient response to immunotherapy. By assessing imaging features and biomarkers in advance, the system identifies patients likely to respond, enabling proactive treatment selection and avoiding ineffective therapies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary predictive model that mediates between the treatment decision and patient outcome. This model integrates imaging and clinical data to generate a predicted response score, serving as an intermediate assessment tool that guides treatment selection and improves overall response rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If immunotherapy treatment is administered, then treatment options are increased, but healthcare costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment optionsVSAvoidhealthcare cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant imaging features and clinical data elements needed for response prediction. By selecting and analyzing only the critical subset of data rather than all available information, the system reduces computational resources and associated costs while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses readily available, low-cost imaging modalities (such as standard CT or MRI scans) and routine clinical biomarkers instead of expensive specialized tests. These conventional imaging and laboratory resources serve as cost-effective proxies for predicting immunotherapy response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive imaging and clinical data analysis is performed, then prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis task into distinct components: imaging feature extraction, clinical data processing, and predictive modeling. Each component handles a specific aspect of data analysis independently, making the overall system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it analyzes diverse data types (imaging and clinical), predicts treatment response, and can be applied across different patient populations and cancer types. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems for each analysis task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240387049A1Predicting responses to biologic therapies using deep learning analysis of imaging and clinical data
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 ONC AI INC
  • US20240387049A1 patent drawing
  • US20240387049A1 patent drawing
  • US20240387049A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes training, using a processing device, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model using training data associated with a plurality of patients to predict biologic therapy treatment responses indicative of a patient survival rate based on a change in volume of a lesion of a patient. The training data is indicative of at least one of unique diagnostic imaging scans at baselines, follow-up intervals, or temporary changes in lesion volume. The method includes providing a pre-treatment image of one or more target lesions of a target patient to the AI model to generate a biologic therapy treatment response. The method includes generating, based on the biologic therapy treatment response, a recommended treatment plan indicating a pharmaceutical product to treat the one or more target lesions of the target patient.