Deep Learning Machine Settings for Fuel-Efficient Mobile Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for determining settings for mobile machines, such as agricultural or construction equipment, do not adequately consider complex interactions between factors like terrain, ground conditions, soil type, weather, and machinery capabilities, leading to suboptimal settings that increase fuel consumption and operational costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning, specifically deep learning models, to generate, update, or enhance machine settings for mobile machines, taking into account various factors to optimize operations such as fuel efficiency, reduced soil compaction, and improved productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If manual planning and simple computations are used to determine machine settings, then the system complexity is low, but the settings quality is subpar leading to increased fuel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual planning and simple heuristic algorithms with a machine learning-based computing system that processes complex interactions between terrain, ground conditions, soil type, weather, and machinery capabilities. This substitution enables optimization of fuel consumption by considering factors that simple computations cannot capture, while the system complexity increase is justified by the significant energy savings achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If preselected settings are used without considering complex interactions, then the operational process is simple, but productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsettings determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a machine learning model that analyzes complex interactions between multiple factors (terrain, ground conditions, soil type, weather, machinery capabilities) to generate optimized machine settings. This replaces simple preselection methods with an intelligent system that considers all relevant factors simultaneously, thereby improving productivity while managing the complexity through automated computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts machine settings parameters based on real-time conditions and learned patterns from training data. By changing parameters such as speed, depth, and other operational settings according to complex environmental interactions, the system optimizes productivity without requiring manual intervention for each condition change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If manual determination of settings is performed, then the system is easy to operate, but the settings do not optimize efficiency and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of settings determinationVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated machine learning system that independently determines optimized machine settings without requiring manual operator intervention. The system self-services by processing environmental data, applying trained models, and generating settings automatically, thereby maintaining ease of operation while significantly reducing operational costs through optimized efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual process of determining settings is replaced with an automated computing system that uses machine learning to optimize efficiency and cost. This substitution maintains ease of operation by eliminating complex manual decision-making while achieving superior cost optimization through consideration of complex factor interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If simple computations are used for settings determination, then the computational resources required are low, but the settings quality is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettings precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple computational methods with a machine learning-based computing system that processes complex interactions between multiple factors. This substitution achieves superior settings precision by capturing non-linear relationships and complex interactions that simple computations cannot model, while managing computational complexity through efficient model architecture and training approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250116974A1Machine Learning Based Machine Settings Enhancement
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US20250116974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250116974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250116974A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include technologies that use machine learning to enhance machine settings (e.g., agricultural machine settings, construction machine settings, forestry machine settings, or landscaping machine settings). Some embodiments include a method that includes using machine learning to generate or update machine settings. In some examples, the method includes receiving, by a computing system, initial settings information, the initial settings information including settings used by or to be used by one or more mobile machines performing one or more tasks. The mobile machine(s) can include machines for farming, construction, forestry, or landscaping. In such examples, the method also includes training, by the computing system, a deep learning model using the settings information. Also, in such examples, the method includes using, by the computing system, the trained model to generate new settings information for a given task.