Deep Nwell Implantation Through Gate Stack

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing semiconductor fabrication processes for CMOS integrated circuits require a separate mask pattern for deep Nwells, increasing cost and cycle time, especially in SRAMs where NMOS driver/pass-gate transistors need screening for Positive Bias Temperature Instability (PBTI) without an added masking level.

Innovation Solution

The method involves implanting deep Nwells through the gate stack for NMOS devices, optionally for PMOS devices, without the need for additional masks, allowing for shallower DNwell depth below the NMOS gate stack, enabling back bias capability for PBTI screening in SRAMs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a separate mask pattern is used for deep Nwell implantation, then the DNwell can be formed with proper depth control, but the fabrication cost and cycle time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDNwell depth controlVSAvoidmasking level complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the DNwell implantation process with the existing gate dielectric formation process by using the gate dielectric layer itself as the masking layer. This eliminates the need for a separate DNwell mask pattern, reducing fabrication complexity while maintaining proper DNwell depth control through the gate dielectric thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate dielectric layer serves multiple functions: it acts as both the gate insulator and the masking layer for DNwell implantation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated masking materials and processes, streamlining the fabrication workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If a separate mask pattern is used for deep Nwell implantation, then the DNwell can be formed with proper depth control, but the fabrication cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDNwell depth controlVSAvoidfabrication cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the DNwell implantation step with the gate dielectric formation sequence, allowing both processes to be completed within the same fabrication cycle without adding extra masking and unmasking steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate dielectric layer is formed first to establish the masking structure before DNwell implantation occurs. This preliminary action ensures that the masking layer is already in place and properly configured, eliminating the need for separate masking preparation steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If DNwell is implanted through the gate stack, then the masking complexity is reduced, but the DNwell depth below the gate stack becomes shallower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasking level complexityVSAvoidDNwell depth below gate stack
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the implantation energy and angle parameters to compensate for the gate electrode blocking effect. By optimizing these parameters, the DNwell achieves the required effective depth for back-bias functionality despite the shallower physical depth below the gate stack

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The DNwell depth is optimized locally under different regions: shallower under the gate stack (where the gate electrode blocks implantation) and deeper under the source/drain regions (where full implantation depth is achieved). This local variation in depth is sufficient to provide the required back-bias capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach eliminates the need for a dedicated DNwell masking level, reducing fabrication costs and cycle time while providing effective PBTI screening for NMOS transistors, enhancing the reliability of CMOS integrated circuits.

Implementation Method 1

a retrograde implant of an n-type species includes implanting through the gate stack for NMOS devices to form a DNwell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon Implantation: Ion Implantation

Data Source

PatentUS9865599B2Transistor with deep Nwell implanted through the gate
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US9865599B2 patent drawing
  • US9865599B2 patent drawing
  • US9865599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of fabricating a CMOS integrated circuit (IC) includes implanting a first n-type dopant at a first masking level that exposes a p-region of a substrate surface having a first gate stack thereon to form NLDD regions for forming n-source/drain extension regions for at least a portion of a plurality of n-channel MOS (NMOS) transistors on the IC. A p-type dopant is implanted at a second masking level that exposes an n-region in the substrate surface having a second gate stack thereon to form PLDD regions for at least a portion of a plurality of p-channel MOS (PMOS) transistors on the IC. A second n-type dopant is retrograde implanted including through the first gate stack to form a deep nwell (DNwell) for the portion of NMOS transistors. A depth of the DNwell is shallower below the first gate stack as compared to under the NLDD regions.