Deep Raffinate Injection Control for Ore Placement Leaching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing leaching operations face inefficiencies due to variable ore mineralogy, oxygen availability, temperature, and operational costs, leading to suboptimal copper recovery and increased costs in mining operations.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing predictive models trained on historical data, including mineralogy, irrigation, and environmental data, to optimize ore placement and leaching processes, adjusting parameters in real-time to enhance copper recovery and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional ore routing based on mineralogy is used, then processing simplicity is maintained, but copper recovery optimization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecopper recoveryVSAvoidore routing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the routing parameters from static mineralogy-based classification to dynamic parameters including real-time leach analytics, oxygen availability, temperature, and predictive model outputs. This allows optimization of copper recovery by adjusting which ores are routed to leaching based on multiple varying parameters rather than fixed mineralogy categories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where leach analytics data and actual copper recovery results are continuously fed back into the predictive models and routing decisions. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to learn from past performance and continuously optimize ore routing to maximize copper recovery while adapting to changing ore characteristics and leaching conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If deep raffinate injection is activated for all ore sections, then copper recovery from oxygen-starved zones is improved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecopper recovery from deep zonesVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies deep raffinate injection selectively only to specific ore sections where predictive models identify oxygen starvation and high copper content. Rather than uniformly applying the treatment across the entire leach pad, the system creates localised treatment zones where it is most effective, thereby improving copper recovery from deep zones while minimising unnecessary operational costs in areas where injection would not provide benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive models perform preliminary analysis of ore placement data, mineralogy, and leach analytics to identify which sections will benefit from deep raffinate injection before the injection occurs. This advance identification allows the system to pre-plan and selectively activate injection only in high-value target zones, avoiding wasteful expenditure on sections where the treatment would not significantly improve copper recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If selective ore placement based on predictive models is implemented, then leaching efficiency is optimized, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleaching efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive model system is designed to handle multiple functions within a unified framework: it processes ore placement data, mineralogy information, leach analytics, and environmental parameters simultaneously to generate routing decisions. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated platform, optimising leaching efficiency while managing data processing complexity through consolidation rather than multiplication of separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves copper recovery by up to 8-16% through optimized ore routing and leaching processes, reducing operational costs and increasing mine life by optimizing ore reserves.

Implementation Method 1

training a predictive model using the historical data to create a trained predictive model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPredictive modeling:

Implementation Method 2

When ferric iron oxidizes copper sulfide minerals, the ferric iron is converted to ferrous iron. The ferrous iron is converted back to ferric iron to further oxidize copper sulfide minerals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

Air or oxygen may either be introduced by physically piping or blowing it into the ore structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAeration: Aeration

Implementation Method 4

Exposure to dilute sulfuric acid carries sufficient chemical energy to put the copper into solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeaching:

Implementation Method 5

Leach recoveries from oxide and carbonate minerals can approach 100% of the contained copper, provided sufficient acid is available for leach reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcid dissolution:

Implementation Method 6

When ferric iron oxidizes copper sulfide minerals, the ferric iron is converted to ferrous iron. The ferrous iron is converted back to ferric iron to further oxidize copper sulfide minerals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS12530637B2System and method for activating deep raffinate injection based on ore placement
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 FREEPORT MCMORAN INC
  • US12530637B2 patent drawing
  • US12530637B2 patent drawing
  • US12530637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method may comprise receiving historical data (e.g., mineralogy data, irrigation data, raffinate data, heat data, lift height data, geographic data on ore placement and/or blower data); training a predictive model using the historical data to create a trained predictive model; adding future assumption data to the trained predictive model; running the forecast engine for a plurality of parameters to obtain forecast data for a mining production target; comparing the forecast data for the mining production target to the actual data for the mining production target; determining deviations between the forecast data and the actual data, based on the comparing; and changing each of the plurality of parameters from the forecast data to the actual data to determine a contribution to the deviations for each of the plurality of parameters.