Emergency Pilot Assistance Using Deep Q Networks for Action Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pilots face challenges during emergency situations in aircraft as existing checklists and protocols lack real-time cross-validation and do not provide forecast or visualization of action spaces, leading to uncertainty in outcomes from their actions.

Innovation Solution

An artificial intelligence-based autonomous pilot assistance system trained using an aircraft simulator computes velocities, altitudes, and headings, providing suggestive guidance to pilots by translating these into control actions through a deep Q network, which calculates reward values for optimal decision-making during emergencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pilots rely on existing checklists and protocols during emergencies, then they have standardized procedures to follow, but they lack real-time cross-validation and forecast of action outcomes, leading to uncertainty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency procedure reliabilityVSAvoidloss of action outcome information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously monitoring aircraft state and comparing pilot actions against the trained policy. The neural network provides immediate feedback on whether actions are optimal given current conditions, enabling real-time cross-validation of pilot decisions during emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The trained neural network policy acts as an intermediary between the complex aircraft system and the pilot. It processes current state information and translates it into recommended actions, providing a layer of intelligence that bridges the gap between standardized checklists and dynamic emergency situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If an AI system provides real-time guidance and cross-validation during emergencies, then pilot decision-making is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot operation easeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by training the neural network policy offline using extensive simulator data before deployment. This pre-training phase captures complex emergency scenarios and optimal responses, so that during actual emergencies, the system only needs to evaluate current state and retrieve pre-computed recommendations, rather than performing complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by training on simulated flight data that replicates real emergency scenarios. The neural network learns from copied experiences in the simulator environment, allowing it to provide intelligent guidance without requiring equally complex real-time computation during actual emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the system computes optimal velocities, altitudes, and headings without human intervention, then computational accuracy is improved, but pilot control and situational understanding may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight parameter computation precisionVSAvoidpilot control ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system inverts the traditional approach by having the AI compute optimal flight parameters (velocities, altitudes, headings) and then translating these into pilot-friendly control recommendations. Rather than the pilot directly controlling raw flight parameters, the system converts computational results into actionable control advice that maintains pilot intuition and understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The policy translation module acts as an intermediary that converts precise computational outputs (velocities, altitudes, headings) into pilot-oriented control recommendations. This intermediary layer preserves the accuracy of computational results while presenting them in a form that maintains pilot situational understanding and control authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220292994A1Artificial intelligence powered emergency pilot assistance system
Publication Date: 2022.09.15 THE BOEING CO
  • US20220292994A1 patent drawing
  • US20220292994A1 patent drawing
  • US20220292994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An emergency pilot assistance system may include an artificial neural network configured to calculate reward (Q) values based on state-action vectors associated with an aircraft. The state-action vectors may include state data associated with the aircraft and action data associated with the aircraft. The system may further include a user output device configured to provide an indication of an action to a user, wherein the action corresponds to an agent action that has a highest reward Q value as calculated by the artificial neural network.