Defeaturing Tool for Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing techniques face constraints such as size limitations, which prevent the production of certain object features, especially in designs intended for larger objects like houses or buildings, where features like door knobs become too small to be replicated effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer control system modifies design files by projecting features that do not meet size constraints onto a surface as a 2D bitmap, incorporating color information, and replacing the original feature with a texture or height difference, allowing for the feature to be represented without violating manufacturing constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If additive manufacturing is used to produce objects with small features, then manufacturing capability is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to size constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoidfeature replication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts 3D features that are too small to manufacture accurately into 2D projections or textures on larger surfaces. By projecting the small feature geometry onto a 2D plane and applying it as a texture or height map on a manufacturable surface, the system preserves the visual appearance of the original feature while working within the size constraints of additive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If design features are reduced in size to fit manufacturing constraints, then ease of manufacture is improved, but loss of information occurs about the original design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing feasibilityVSAvoiddesign detail fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a 2D copy or projection of the original 3D feature and applies it as a texture or surface pattern. Instead of attempting to manufacture the small 3D feature directly, the system captures its geometric information, projects it onto a 2D plane, and applies it as a visual representation on the manufactured object's surface, thereby preserving design information in a manufacturable form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If small features are removed from the design, then ease of manufacture is improved, but the design completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing feasibilityVSAvoiddesign completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a 2D projection or texture as an intermediary between the original small 3D feature and the manufactured object. This intermediary carries the visual and geometric information of the original feature and applies it to the surface of the manufactured object, allowing the feature to be represented without physically manufacturing the small 3D structure itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10456982B2Defeaturing tool for additive manufacturing of objects
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 MATERIALISE NV
  • US10456982B2 patent drawing
  • US10456982B2 patent drawing
  • US10456982B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for modifying features in designs of objects to make them physically capable of being manufactured using additive manufacturing techniques and machines is provided.