Defect Binning and Noise Filtering for Semiconductor Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor inspection processes face challenges in efficiently distinguishing between real defects and noise or nuisance events, requiring time-consuming manual setup of data acquisition and processing parameters, and often result in suboptimal defect review processes due to the complexity of adjusting parameters for various defect types.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that detects noise in inspection data by using detection parameters known to identify noise and nuisance events, eliminates these events, and bins defects based on characteristics and spatial signatures, allowing for optimized data acquisition and processing parameters to improve throughput and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes are used to set up inspection processes with data acquisition and data processing parameters, then the inspection process can be customized for different defect types, but the setup time becomes relatively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization for different defect typesVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal data acquisition and data processing parameters by analyzing defect characteristics and inspection requirements, eliminating the need for manual parameter setup. The inspection system self-configures by selecting from predefined parameter sets based on the specific defect type and inspection goals, thereby reducing setup time while maintaining customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If all possible combinations of data acquisition and data processing parameters are tested to find the best inspection process, then the optimal inspection process can be identified, but the time and computational resources required become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of inspection processVSAvoidparameter testing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes multiple sets of data acquisition and data processing parameters corresponding to different defect types and inspection scenarios. Before actual inspection, the system selects the appropriate pre-configured parameter set based on defect characteristics, avoiding the need to test all possible parameter combinations during the inspection process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains a library of predefined parameter sets with different data acquisition and processing configurations. Based on the identified defect type and inspection requirements, the system dynamically selects and applies the most suitable parameter set from the library, achieving optimal inspection performance without exhaustive parameter testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If noise and nuisance events are reduced by using optimized parameters and filtering techniques, then the quality of inspection results improves, but the process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of inspection resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of parameter optimization and filtering
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures optimized parameter sets that are specifically designed to minimize noise and nuisance events for different defect types. By selecting from these pre-optimized parameters rather than performing real-time optimization, the system achieves high inspection quality without the complexity of dynamic parameter tuning and extensive filtering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9037280B2Computer-implemented methods for performing one or more defect-related functions
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 KLA TENCOR TECHNOLOGY CORP
  • US9037280B2 patent drawing
  • US9037280B2 patent drawing
  • US9037280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented methods for performing one or more defect-related functions are provided. One method for identifying noise in inspection data includes identifying events detected in a number of sets of inspection data that is less than a predetermined number as noise. One method for binning defects includes binning the defects into groups based on defect characteristics and the sets of the inspection data in which the defects were detected. One method for selecting defects for defect analysis includes binning defects into group(s) based on proximity of the defects to each other and spatial signatures formed by the group(s). A different method for selecting defects for defect analysis includes selecting defects having the greatest diversity of defect characteristic(s) for defect analysis. One method includes classifying defects on a specimen using inspection data generated for the specimen combined with defect review data generated for the specimen.