Defect Classification via Electrical Design Intent Annotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wafer inspection methods lack the ability to accurately classify defects based on electrical design intent, leading to misclassification and increased manufacturing costs due to the inability to determine the criticality of defects, especially in cases where electrical structures are missing or incomplete.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that annotates design data with electrical design properties, allowing for the classification of defects by comparing inspection images to annotated design data, which includes patterns of interest with electrical properties, thereby determining the criticality of defects and improving defect classification accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional wafer inspection methods are used to detect defects, then defects can be identified, but the defects cannot be accurately classified based on electrical design intent, leading to misclassification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification accuracyVSAvoidelectrical design intent information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary annotation of design data with electrical design properties before defect classification. Electrical design properties such as voltage, current, resistance, and circuit functionality are pre-assigned to different regions and structures in the design data, enabling subsequent accurate defect classification without losing electrical intent information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of electrical design property annotations that bridge the gap between physical defect detection and electrical functionality assessment. These annotations act as a mediator that connects inspection images to design intent, enabling accurate classification of defects based on their electrical impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If defect inspection is performed without electrical design context, then inspection speed is maintained, but manufacturing costs increase due to misclassification and inability to determine defect criticality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies electrical design properties locally to specific regions, structures, and patterns in the design data. Different areas are annotated with relevant electrical characteristics (e.g., high-voltage regions, sensitive signal lines, redundant structures), enabling rapid assessment of defect criticality without进行全面 analysis, thus maintaining inspection throughput while reducing misclassification costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If electrical structures are missing or incomplete in the design data, then inspection can proceed, but defect criticality cannot be determined, leading to increased misclassification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling incomplete design dataVSAvoiddefect criticality assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares design data in advance by annotating electrical design properties and establishing default classification rules for various structure types. This cushioning preparation ensures that even when electrical structures are missing or incomplete during inspection, the system can still classify defects accurately using the pre-established annotations and rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where classification results and defect patterns are continuously analyzed to refine electrical design property annotations. This feedback loop improves the system's ability to handle incomplete design data by learning from actual defect patterns and adjusting classification criteria accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10209628B2System and method for defect classification based on electrical design intent
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 KLA CORP
  • US10209628B2 patent drawing
  • US10209628B2 patent drawing
  • US10209628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically classifying one or more defects based on electrical design properties includes receiving one or more images of a selected region of a sample, receiving one or more sets of design data associated with the selected region of the sample, locating one or more defects in the one or more images of the selected region of the sample by comparing the one or more images of the selected region of the sample to the one or more sets of design data, retrieving one or more patterns of interest from the one or more sets of design data corresponding to the one or more defects, and classifying the one or more defects in the one or more images of the selected region of the sample based on one or more annotated electrical design properties included in the one or more patterns of interest.