Image Processing Device Defect Correction Circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing imaging devices face challenges in correcting defects and reducing noise in digital images, particularly when defects change with conditions like temperature and analog gain, leading to deteriorated image quality due to incorrect defect determination and noise reduction effects.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device with a defect correcting unit and a noise-reduction processing unit that share a line memory, using a contrast determining unit and averaging unit to select between correction values based on signal value comparisons and thresholds, switching between averaging and replacement data processing to minimize the influence of defects on noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a common line memory is shared between defect correcting unit and noise-reduction processing unit, then circuit size is reduced, but image quality deteriorates due to wrong defect determination affecting noise reduction processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit sizeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing flow into distinct stages: defect determination stage and noise reduction stage. The defect determination unit operates first to identify defective pixels, then the noise reduction unit processes non-defective pixels. This segmentation prevents defective pixel data from contaminating the noise reduction processing, thereby maintaining image quality while still sharing the common line memory resource.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary defect determination before noise reduction processing. By identifying and flagging defective pixels in advance, the system prepares the data in a suitable state for subsequent noise reduction processing. This preliminary action ensures that only valid pixel data undergoes noise reduction, preventing quality deterioration while utilizing the shared memory efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If defect correction and noise reduction are performed in parallel, then processing efficiency is improved, but noise reduction effect is not obtained for pixels subjected to defect correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidnoise reduction effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic processing approach where the noise reduction unit adaptively adjusts its operation based on defect determination results. Rather than rigid parallel processing, the system dynamically routes pixel data: defective pixels bypass noise reduction, while non-defective pixels undergo noise reduction processing. This dynamic adaptation ensures both processing efficiency and effective noise reduction where applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies noise reduction selectively to specific regions (non-defective pixels) rather than uniformly to all pixels. This local quality approach ensures that noise reduction effects are applied only where needed and where they will be effective, while defective pixels are handled separately through correction mechanisms, optimizing both efficiency and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If high analog gain is set due to low illuminance, then signal sensitivity is improved, but noise is intensified and mistakenly determined as defects, weakening noise reduction effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal sensitivityVSAvoidnoise intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for defect determination from absolute signal intensity to contrast-based metrics. By evaluating the difference between pixel values rather than absolute values, the system becomes insensitive to the overall noise level intensified by high analog gain. This parameter transformation allows accurate defect detection even in high-noise, low-illuminance conditions while preserving the sensitivity benefits of high gain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional defect detection approach: instead of identifying defects by their absolute signal values, it identifies them by their deviation from surrounding pixels (contrast). This inversion of the detection paradigm allows the system to distinguish true defects from noise amplification, maintaining signal sensitivity while filtering out noise-induced false defect detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS8964069B2Image processing device and solid-state imaging device including a defect correcting function
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8964069B2 patent drawing
  • US8964069B2 patent drawing
  • US8964069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an image processing device includes a defect correcting unit, a noise-reduction processing unit, and a selecting unit. The defect correcting unit executes defect correction on a target pixel. The defect correcting unit switches, according to the level of contrast determined concerning a plurality of peripheral pixels, a first correction value obtained through averaging processing for signal values of the peripheral pixels and a second correction value other than the first correction value.