Defect Inspection Illuminance Adjustment via Histogram Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In photolithography processes for semiconductor device manufacturing, defect inspection is time-consuming due to the need to repeatedly adjust and compare images of substrates at different illuminances to set optimal illuminance levels, making it difficult to accurately judge defects when luminance is too high or low.

Innovation Solution

A method involving illuminance adjustment steps where different illuminances are applied to multiple measurement regions on a substrate while moving, with image processing to find a reference luminance through histograms, allowing for automatic setting of optimal illuminance based on correlation analysis, reducing the need for multiple substrate movements and direct image comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the luminance of the image of the wafer is too high or too low, then defects on the wafer cannot be judged, but appropriately adjusting the illuminance requires repeatedly moving the wafer and picking up images at different illuminances which takes a long time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect judgment accuracyVSAvoidtime for defect inspection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing the correlation between illuminance and reference luminance through histogram analysis before actual defect inspection. The system performs illuminance adjustment using the established correlation to directly determine optimal illuminance without repeated trial-and-error movements, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the optimum illuminance is set by repeatedly applying illumination and picking up images at different illuminances, then the balance of luminance can be checked, but the wafer must be moved many times which increases inspection time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminance balance accuracyVSAvoidinspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error system with an automated computational system. Instead of mechanically moving the wafer multiple times to check luminance balance, the system uses histogram analysis and correlation calculations to automatically determine the optimal illuminance, thereby maintaining reliability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple images are picked up and compared to set optimal illuminance, then appropriate luminance balance can be achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveilluminance setting precisionVSAvoidtime for illuminance adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the illuminance setting process from a multi-step mechanical adjustment into a computational parameter optimization problem. The system changes the approach from physically moving the wafer and comparing images to analyzing luminance parameters through histograms and calculating correlations, thereby achieving precise illuminance setting with minimal time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8040500B2Defect inspection method and computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2011.10.18 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US8040500B2 patent drawing
  • US8040500B2 patent drawing
  • US8040500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention includes an illuminance adjustment step of setting an optimum illuminance of the illumination; and a defect inspection step of picking up the image of the substrate illuminated with the illumination at the optimum illuminance, wherein the illuminance adjustment step has: a first step of applying illuminations at different illuminances to a plurality of measurement regions on a front surface of the substrate and picking up an image of each of the measurement regions, while moving the substrate; a second step of making a luminance of the picked up image of each of the measurement regions into a histogram to find a reference luminance where an integral value from a maximum luminance side of the histogram is a predetermined value; and a third step of calculating a correlation between each of the reference luminances and the illuminance, and setting based on the correlation an illuminance at which the reference luminance coincides with a predetermined luminance, as the optimum illuminance.