Defect Inspection Using Region-Specific Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional defect inspection methods for semiconductor substrates are inefficient due to low accuracy in classifying defects, requiring extensive manual inspection and increasing manufacturing time and cost, as they rely on uniform parameters for all regions despite varying background signals and defect types.

Innovation Solution

The method involves illuminating specific points on a semiconductor substrate with light and analyzing it using region-specific characteristic parameters such as contrast, intensity, and brightness to accurately detect and classify defects without the need for subsequent manual inspection, employing a scanning unit, determining unit, and inspecting unit to differentiate between inspection regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uniform parameters are used for inspecting all regions of the semiconductor substrate, then the inspection process is simple and fast, but the defect classification accuracy is low requiring manual review

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoiddefect classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the semiconductor substrate into multiple inspection regions and assigning different characteristic parameters to each region based on its specific background signal characteristics. This allows each region to be inspected with optimized parameters tailored to its local features, improving defect classification accuracy without sacrificing inspection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically selecting different characteristic parameters (such as contrast, intensity, brightness) for different inspection regions based on their background signal characteristics. This enables the inspection system to adapt parameters to local conditions, achieving high accuracy automated classification across diverse regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple inspection regions are set on a single semiconductor substrate to accommodate increased integration, then more defects can be detected, but the inspection time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the semiconductor substrate into multiple inspection regions, each with its own characteristic parameters. This allows parallel processing of different regions with optimized parameters, enabling comprehensive defect detection across the entire substrate while maintaining efficient inspection throughput through automated classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the inspection system to automatically classify defects using region-specific characteristic parameters without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously determines defect types and makes pass/fail decisions, eliminating time-consuming manual review processes even when inspecting hundreds of regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection is performed to accurately classify defects, then defect classification accuracy is high, but the reviewing time and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification accuracyVSAvoidreviewing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the automated inspection system to classify defects autonomously using characteristic parameters specific to each inspection region. The system automatically determines defect types and makes classification decisions without human intervention, achieving both high accuracy and efficiency by eliminating manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection process with an automated optical inspection system that uses characteristic parameters for defect classification. This substitution eliminates the need for human reviewers while maintaining or improving classification accuracy through consistent, objective parameter-based analysis across all inspection regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces reviewing time by accurately classifying defects, allowing for automated inspection and reducing manufacturing costs by eliminating the need for manual review processes.

Implementation Method 1

a light emitter for emitting light onto the semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light

Implementation Method 2

to collect scattered or reflected light from the semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

to collect scattered or reflected light from the semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS7433032B2Method and apparatus for inspecting defects in multiple regions with different parameters
Publication Date: 2008.10.07 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US7433032B2 patent drawing
  • US7433032B2 patent drawing
  • US7433032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of inspecting defects, a first actual region of an actual object is inspected based on a first characteristic parameter as an inspection condition. A point where an inspection region of the actual object is changed into a second actual region from the first actual region is determined. The second actual region is then inspected based on a second characteristic parameter as the inspection condition. The first and second parameters may include contrast of a light that is reflected from a reference object, intensity of the light, brightness of the light, a size of a minute structure on the reference object, etc. The characteristic parameters of each reference region on the reference object are set. Thus, the defects may be accurately classified so that a time and a cost for reviewing the defects may be markedly reduced.