Defect List Management for Quick Storage Media Re-initialization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The re-initialization of rewritable information storage media can be time-intensive when all blocks or defect blocks are determined as defective through the verify-after-write process, leading to inconvenience for users.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for quick re-initialization of information storage media that involves managing defect blocks and replacement blocks by seeking and certifying defect entries in a defect list, deleting entries without certification, and updating state information to indicate defect or replacement block status without requiring a verify-after-write process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a verify-after-write process is performed to determine defect blocks during re-initialization, then the reliability of defect detection is improved, but the re-initialization time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidre-initialization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a quick re-initialization without the traditional verify-after-write process. The defect blocks are identified and managed through a different mechanism (using defect lists and replacement blocks) before actual data recording, allowing the re-initialization to complete quickly while still ensuring data integrity through alternative defect management methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the defect management process into distinct components: defect identification during quick re-initialization, defect registration in a defect list, and replacement block allocation. This segmentation allows the re-initialization process to proceed quickly without waiting for verify-after-write completion, while defect management continues through other mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If all blocks are checked through verify-after-write process during re-initialization, then complete defect information is obtained, but the operation complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect information completenessVSAvoidre-initialization operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the defect verification step from the re-initialization process. Instead of performing verify-after-write on all blocks during re-initialization, the system extracts defect information through quicker methods and manages it separately through defect lists and replacement blocks, simplifying the re-initialization operation while maintaining defect information integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary defect identification through quick re-initialization without complete verification, then handles defect management separately. This preliminary action allows re-initialization to complete quickly while defect information is gathered and managed through alternative mechanisms that don't block the re-initialization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If defect blocks are managed with replacement blocks, then data recording reliability is improved, but the defect list management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recording reliabilityVSAvoiddefect list management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by automatically managing replacement blocks and defect lists without requiring manual verification or complex user intervention. When a defect block is identified, the system automatically allocates a replacement block and updates the defect list, ensuring data recording reliability through automated defect management while keeping the process simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8140891B2Method of determining defects in information storage medium, recording/reproducing apparatus using the same, and information storage medium
Publication Date: 2012.03.20 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8140891B2 patent drawing
  • US8140891B2 patent drawing
  • US8140891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining whether a defect exists on an information storage medium is provided along with a recording/reproducing apparatus using the same. Such a method comprises: seeking a defect entry whose state information indicates that a defect block or a replacement block has been re-initialized without certification from a defect list for managing an information storage medium and including state information of the defect block and state information of the replacement block, wherein the medium includes a spare area for recording the replacement block to replace the defect block occurring in a user data area on the medium; and certifying the defect block or the replacement block registered in the sought defect entry. As a result, defect information can be effectively rearranged for quick re-initialization without certification in order to improve the performance of a drive system.