Defect Prediction in Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBFAM) faces challenges in predicting the location-specific formation of defects despite optimal settings, due to variations in process parameters such as beam spot size, scan speed, and layer thickness.

Innovation Solution

A method for location-specific probabilistic prediction of defect formation in PBFAM involves determining first statistical distributions of process parameters, threshold temperature distributions for defect formation, cumulative thermal histories, and calculating the probability of defect formation based on these factors to generate an article integrity map.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If iterative modeling simulation is used to adjust parameters for acceptable quality, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovequalityVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary probabilistic prediction of defect formation before actual manufacturing by analyzing statistical distributions of process parameters and thermal histories. This allows identifying potential defect locations in advance, enabling preventive parameter adjustments without requiring multiple iterative simulations, thus saving time while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical iterative trial-and-error simulation process with a probabilistic prediction model that uses statistical distributions and thermal history analysis. This substitution transforms the quality assessment from repeated physical simulations to a computational probability calculation, significantly reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If probabilistic prediction model is implemented, then reliability of defect prediction is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect prediction problem into distinct components: statistical distribution analysis of process parameters, thermal history calculation, and probability computation. By dividing the complex prediction task into modular segments, the system achieves high reliability through comprehensive analysis while managing complexity through structured organization of computational steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate prediction of defect formation probabilities at specific locations within the article, improving the quality control and manufacturing capability of PBFAM systems by identifying potential defects before they occur.

Implementation Method 1

a laser is used to melt and fuse the powder material layer by layer to form the article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a recoater is used to distribute and level the powder material across the build plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical spreading:

Data Source

PatentEP4545220A1Location-specific probabilistic approach for prediction of defect formation in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2025.04.30 RTX CORP
  • EP4545220A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4545220A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4545220A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method (34) for location-specific probabilistic prediction of formation of a defect in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of an article (26) includes determining first statistical distributions of multiple process parameters selected from laser power, scan speed, laser spot size, and powder layer thickness and density, based on the first statistical distributions, for locations across the article (26), determining second statistical distributions of a threshold temperature (Tthresh) for formation of the defect at each of the locations, determining a cumulative temperature thermal history (T0) at each of the locations across the article (26), for each of the locations across the article (26), determining a probability of formation of the defect based upon a probability of Tthresh versus T0, and from the probability of formation of the defect at each of the locations, generating an article integrity map.