Deferred Passive Track Activation for Tracking Device Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tracking devices face high latency and computational complexity when handling multiple targets due to the need to maintain both active and secondary tracks, leading to inefficient processing of measurements and increased computational resources.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a tracking device that distinguishes between active and passive tracks, deferring computations on passive tracks until specific criteria are met, such as available computational capacity or track probability, allowing for reduced algorithmic complexity and lower computational resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If both primary and secondary tracks are maintained actively, then track reliability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides tracks into two distinct segments: active tracks and passive tracks. Active tracks receive full computational processing including association with incoming measurements, while passive tracks are maintained with minimal processing. This segmentation allows the system to maintain multiple track hypotheses (improving reliability) while reducing the computational burden by not actively processing all tracks simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing only a subset of tracks (active tracks) with full computational resources, while maintaining other tracks (passive tracks) with minimal processing. This allows the system to maintain multiple track hypotheses without performing exhaustive computations on all of them, thus reducing overall computational complexity while preserving track reliability through selective full processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If all tracks are processed simultaneously, then measurement precision is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement association precisionVSAvoidsystem latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments track processing into two tiers: active tracks that receive immediate and precise association processing with incoming measurements, and passive tracks that are maintained without immediate processing. This segmentation enables the system to achieve high measurement precision for active tracks while avoiding the latency that would result from simultaneously processing all tracks with the same level of detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by allowing passive tracks to be activated and processed as active tracks at periodic intervals or when specific conditions are met. This approach ensures that tracks maintain precision over time through periodic full processing, while avoiding continuous simultaneous processing of all tracks that would increase latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If computational capacity is increased, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking processing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the system's processing allocation adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts which tracks are active and which are passive based on current computational capacity, track probabilities, and other criteria. This dynamic approach allows the system to maximize productivity when computational resources are available while maintaining lower complexity when resources are constrained, without requiring a permanently over-provisioned complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3117236B1Tracking device with deferred activation and propagation of passive tracks
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 TERMA AS
  • EP3117236B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3117236B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3117236B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a tracking device configured to estimate a track for at least one possible target and configured to receive incoming measurements and to process measurements and tracks, which tracking device is configured with a storage and a computational device having a computational capacity and configured with an association module configured to calculate an association between a measurement and a track. The tracking device further comprises an output module configured to output a sequence of track updates from an assignment module maintaining a set of active tracks using the association module as a function of active tracks and the incoming measurements to calculate associations, containing possible track updates and deciding which track updates to keep in the set of active tracks and which track updates to add to a set of passive tracks. Computations on the set of passive tracks may be deferred until at least one passive track handling criterion is fulfilled; and the computational device may be configured to activate a passive track from the set of passive tracks and transfer the passive track from the set of passive tracks to the set of active tracks.