Deferred Semi-Persistent Scheduling Feedback Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communications systems, semi-persistent scheduling feedback transmission often faces conflicts with other resources, leading to inefficiencies due to resource availability changes, particularly in scenarios where the likelihood of ACKs is high or subsequent uplink symbols are used for other information.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of on-demand transmission of deferred semi-persistent scheduling feedback, where user equipment (UE) receives control messages to temporarily override default configurations, allowing for non-deferral of feedback transmission when resources change, optimizing resource management by using second configurations based on traffic conditions and resource availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE defers feedback transmission when uplink symbol availability changes, then the feedback can be transmitted in available uplink resources, but the transmission time is delayed and resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback transmission reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the feedback transmission behavior changeable based on network conditions. The base station can dynamically indicate to the UE whether to defer feedback or not, allowing the system to adapt between reliability (deferring) and timeliness (not deferring) based on real-time resource availability and traffic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the UE uses default configuration for feedback management, then the behavior is predictable and simple, but the system cannot adapt to changing network conditions and traffic patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback management simplicityVSAvoidnetwork condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the feedback management parameter (deferral behavior) based on network conditions. The base station changes the operational parameter of the UE from fixed default behavior to conditional behavior based on indicated network state, enabling adaptability while maintaining simplicity through base station control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the UE transmits feedback immediately when resources are available, then the throughput is maximized, but power consumption and processing overhead increase due to continuous monitoring and decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback transmission throughputVSAvoidUE power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the base station pre-configure and indicate the feedback management behavior before the actual transmission decision is needed. This allows the UE to follow predetermined instructions without continuously analyzing network conditions, reducing processing overhead and power consumption while maintaining optimal throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the base station provides detailed control messages for feedback management, then the resource allocation optimization is improved, but the signaling overhead and message complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol message complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies taking out by extracting only the essential control information needed for feedback management from the complete set of possible control parameters. The base station provides targeted indications specifically for feedback deferral behavior rather than comprehensive control messages, achieving optimization with minimal signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240178944A1On demand transmission of deferred semi-persistent scheduling feedback
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240178944A1 patent drawing
  • US20240178944A1 patent drawing
  • US20240178944A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may be configured with a first configuration that the UE is to use for semi-persistent scheduling transmissions when availability of one or more uplink symbols in which the feedback is scheduled for transmission to a base station changes (e.g., due to a slot format change). The UE may be configured to defer transmission of the feedback until a subsequent uplink resource. The UE may receive, from the base station, an indication of a second configuration that the UE is to use for the semi-persistent scheduling transmissions when availability of one or more uplink symbols in which the feedback is scheduled for transmission to a base station changes. The UE may not defer transmission based on the second configuration.