Defibrillation Decision Algorithms for CPR Artefact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) face challenges in accurately detecting shockable rhythms during CPR due to artefact signals, which can lead to incorrect diagnoses and prolonged 'hands-off' times, compromising patient survival rates.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing three algorithms to determine shockable rhythms: one for analyzing ECG signals during chest compression, another for analyzing in the absence of chest compression, and a third to detect the cessation of chest compression, allowing for rapid and reliable defibrillation decision-making by combining data from all algorithms to minimize artefact interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single algorithm is used to analyze ECG signals during CPR, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to artefact signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidshockable rhythm detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the ECG analysis into three separate algorithms, each specialized for specific conditions: one for detecting shockable rhythms during chest compression, another for analyzing ECG without chest compression, and a third for detecting chest compression status. This segmentation allows each algorithm to be optimized for its specific task, improving overall measurement precision while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension by analyzing ECG signals at different phases of the CPR cycle. By switching between algorithms based on whether the patient is undergoing chest compression or not, the system leverages time-based differentiation to overcome the limitations of single-algorithm approaches, effectively adding a dimension to the analysis that improves detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Speed

If algorithms continuously analyze ECG signals during CPR, then the shock delivery speed is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to artefact interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock delivery speedVSAvoiddiagnosis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic algorithm selection based on the detection of chest compression status. The system continuously monitors whether the patient is undergoing chest compression and switches between appropriate algorithms accordingly. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain both speed and reliability by using the most suitable algorithm for the current physiological state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the chest compression detection algorithm to determine which ECG analysis algorithm should be active. This feedback loop ensures that the appropriate algorithm is continuously applied based on real-time patient conditions, maintaining diagnostic reliability while enabling rapid shock delivery decisions when indicated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the system waits for chest compression to cease before analyzing ECG signals, then the measurement precision is improved, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveECG signal qualityVSAvoidhands-off time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the first algorithm continuously analyze ECG signals during chest compression, preparing for potential shock delivery. The system does not wait for compression to cease before initiating analysis, but rather maintains continuous monitoring and can immediately proceed to shock delivery when indicated, thereby reducing hands-off time while still achieving precise measurements through the specialized first algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If transthoracic impedance measurement is added to detect chest compression, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechest compression detection accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the ECG analysis algorithms multi-functional by enabling them to operate in different modes depending on chest compression status. The same ECG analysis infrastructure is used for both during-compression and post-compression analysis, with the third algorithm simply controlling which mode is active. This approach improves reliability through better detection while avoiding the need for entirely separate measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9308383B2Method, apparatus and computer program for defibrillation delivery decision
Publication Date: 2016.04.12 SCHILLER MEDICAL
  • US9308383B2 patent drawing
  • US9308383B2 patent drawing
  • US9308383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and computer program for defibrillation delivery decision comprising the steps of: a) Determining a shockable rhythm with a first algorithm, whereby said first algorithm is adapted to analyze an ECG signal in the presence of chest compression; b) Determining a shockable rhythm with a second algorithm, whereby said second algorithm is adapted to analyze an ECG in the absence of chest compression; c) Determining with a third algorithm if the patient is undergoing chest compression.