Defibrillator Discharge Control via Mobile Device Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are often costly and bulky, limiting their deployment, and many locations lack access to them during cardiac emergencies due to high costs and intimidation factors for bystanders, despite their potential to save lives.

Innovation Solution

A portable defibrillator system that utilizes a mobile communication device, such as a smartphone, for power and processing, featuring a shock discharge capacitor, voltage sensor, and controller to manage the defibrillation shock phases based on capacitor voltage measurements, enabling efficient energy delivery and user-friendly operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional defibrillator design is used, then reliable defibrillation function is achieved, but device size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation functionVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the power supply and complex control electronics from the defibrillator unit itself, utilizing the mobile communication device's battery and processing capabilities instead. This allows the defibrillator to be a minimal device containing only the essential shock delivery components, dramatically reducing its size while maintaining full defibrillation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile communication device serves multiple functions: it provides power supply, processing control, user interface, and communication capabilities. By making the defibrillator system universal and compatible with existing mobile devices, the patent eliminates the need for dedicated power and control systems in the defibrillator unit itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional defibrillator design is used, then defibrillation capability is ensured, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation capabilityVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile communication device provides its own power supply, processing capabilities, and user interface without requiring additional dedicated components in the defibrillator unit. This self-service approach eliminates the need for expensive batteries, microprocessors, and display systems in the defibrillator itself, dramatically reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the defibrillator functionality with the mobile communication device, combining two devices into one integrated system. This consolidation allows the mobile device to serve dual purposes, eliminating redundant components and reducing overall system cost while maintaining full defibrillation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If precise shock termination control is implemented, then energy delivery efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy delivery efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the controller continuously monitors capacitor voltage during discharge and automatically terminates the shock when a predetermined voltage threshold is reached. This feedback mechanism ensures precise energy delivery efficiency by stopping the shock at the optimal moment, while the automation reduces the perceived complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual timing mechanisms with electronic voltage monitoring and automatic control. Instead of using mechanical timers or manual intervention to control shock duration, the system uses electronic sensors and microprocessor control to automatically terminate the shock based on real-time voltage measurements, improving precision while simplifying user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances the availability and usability of defibrillators by reducing size and cost, allowing for efficient energy delivery and user-friendly operation, thereby increasing the chances of timely intervention during cardiac emergencies.

Implementation Method 1

a voltage sensor that measures the voltage of the shock discharge capacitor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage measurement: Ohm's Law

Implementation Method 2

a shock discharge capacitor, discharge circuitry suitable for discharging the capacitor to deliver a defibrillation shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11607555B2Defibrillator discharge control
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 AVIVE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11607555B2 patent drawing
  • US11607555B2 patent drawing
  • US11607555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Defibrillator shock discharge control systems and schemes are described that control the shock discharge based at least in part on discharge capacitor voltage measurement taken after the defibrillation shock has been initiated.