Defibrillator False Shock Prevention via Impedance Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

External automated defibrillators face challenges in accurately detecting shockable rhythms due to signal noise introduced by patient movement or electrode manipulation, which can lead to false determinations and inappropriate shock delivery.

Innovation Solution

The defibrillator utilizes the patient's transthoracic impedance to detect interference conditions by calculating the first derivative and energy-related quantities within a moving time window, preventing false shockable rhythm detection if these exceed a certain threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the defibrillator continuously monitors ECG and ICG signals to detect shockable rhythms, then the diagnostic capability is improved, but signal noise from patient movement or electrode manipulation increases the risk of false detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverhythm detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse detection risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces transthoracic impedance (I CG) as an intermediary parameter to detect interference conditions. By monitoring impedance changes caused by patient movement or electrode manipulation, the system can identify when ECG signals are compromised and prevent false rhythm detection, thus resolving the contradiction between continuous monitoring capability and false detection risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring ICG signals and using this information to modulate the diagnostic algorithm's interpretation of ECG data. When impedance variations indicate interference, the system adjusts its detection logic to avoid false positives, maintaining both diagnostic sensitivity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the defibrillator delivers shocks based on diagnostic algorithm detection, then therapeutic intervention is provided, but inappropriate shock delivery may occur due to false detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment delivery speedVSAvoidinappropriate shock delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively detecting interference conditions through ICG monitoring before false rhythm detection can occur. By identifying movement or electrode manipulation events in advance, the system prevents inappropriate shock delivery while maintaining rapid response capability for genuine cardiac emergencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Extent of automation

If the defibrillator uses a diagnostic algorithm to analyze ECG signals, then automated rhythm detection is achieved, but noise from patient movement or electrode handling can mislead the algorithm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated rhythm detectionVSAvoidsignal interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the ICG electrode serve multiple functions: it simultaneously measures both impedance (for interference detection) and contributes to ECG signal acquisition. This multi-functionality allows the automated diagnostic algorithm to benefit from cross-validation between two different physiological measurements, improving signal interpretation accuracy while maintaining full automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the reliability and safety of public access defibrillators by reducing false shock deliveries and ensuring accurate rhythm classification, even during patient movement or electrode disturbances.

Implementation Method 1

patient electrodes for obtaining the patient's electrocardiogram (ECG)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocardiography: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

a signal (Z) which is a measure of the patient's transthoracic impedance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical impedance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

an impedance measurement circuit produces an output indicative of the impedance of the interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance measurement: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 4

an impedance measurement circuit produces an output indicative of the impedance of the interface, which output is then fed into a differentiator to produce an output that is proportional to the derivative of the impedance signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferentiation:

Data Source

PatentEP2646111B1An external defibrillator
Publication Date: 2018.10.24 HEARTSINE TECH
  • EP2646111B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2646111B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2646111B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An external defibrillator includes patient electrodes (20) for obtaining the patient's electrocardiogram (ECG) and for applying a shock to the patient. A microprocessor (24) analyses the patient's ECG using a diagnostic algorithm to detect if the patient's heart is in a shockable rhythm, and shock delivery circuitry (10) is enabled when a shockable rhythm is detected by the diagnostic algorithm. The patient electrodes also allow obtaining a signal (Z) which is a measure of the patient's transthoracic impedance and the microprocessor is responsive to Z to detect conditions likely to cause the diagnostic algorithm to generate a false detection of a shockable rhythm. If such detection is made, the microprocessor prevents detection of a shockable rhythm by the diagnostic algorithm, at least for a period of time.