Defibrillator Sync Mode Automatic Shock Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual defibrillators often suffer from user error in switching between synchronized and asynchronous shock modes, leading to potential misdelivery of shocks during cardiac emergencies, which can exacerbate ventricular fibrillation or fail to provide necessary therapy.

Innovation Solution

An external defibrillator with a housing, heart rhythm detector, manual mode controller, and automatic mode controller that allows manual selection of shock mode and automatically adjusts the mode based on detected heart rhythms post-shock delivery, reducing user confusion and ensuring appropriate timing of subsequent shocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual mode selection is used for switching between synchronized and asynchronous shock modes, then user control over shock delivery is improved, but user error and misdelivery of shocks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidshock delivery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The defibrillator automatically determines whether to deliver synchronized or asynchronous shocks based on detected heart rhythm characteristics, eliminating the need for manual user selection. The device serves itself by autonomously analyzing the ECG signal and making mode decisions, thereby preventing user error while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors heart rhythm parameters and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the shock delivery mode. By detecting features such as QRS complex morphology and timing, the device receives real-time feedback about the patient's cardiac state and automatically selects the appropriate mode, ensuring reliable shock delivery without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automatic mode selection is implemented based on detected heart rhythm, then user error is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock delivery accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The defibrillator performs preliminary analysis of the heart rhythm characteristics before shock delivery to pre-determine the appropriate mode. By evaluating ECG features in advance and setting the mode accordingly, the system avoids the need for complex real-time decision-making during critical moments, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (synchronized vs. asynchronous mode) based on detected heart rhythm parameters. By monitoring specific ECG features such as QRS duration, amplitude, and morphology, the device automatically adjusts its delivery mode in response to parameter changes in the patient's cardiac state, achieving reliable automation without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If synchronized shock mode is used, then shock timing precision is improved, but risk of exacerbating ventricular fibrillation increases when incorrectly applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock timing precisionVSAvoidrisk of worsening VF
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The defibrillator performs preliminary detection and analysis of the heart rhythm to determine whether synchronized mode is appropriate before delivering the shock. By pre-assessing the cardiac state and identifying suitable synchronization points in the ECG cycle, the system ensures that synchronized shocks are only delivered when safe, preventing the exacerbation of ventricular fibrillation while maintaining timing precision when applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors ECG parameters and uses this feedback to determine the safety of synchronized shock delivery. By detecting real-time heart rhythm characteristics and comparing them against safety criteria, the device receives feedback that prevents synchronized shocks from being delivered when the patient's condition would be worsened, thereby eliminating the harmful effect while preserving the benefit of precise timing when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9827435B2Defibrillator with sync mode assisting selection of feature to lock-on
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 PHYSIO CONTROL CORP
  • US9827435B2 patent drawing
  • US9827435B2 patent drawing
  • US9827435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An external defibrillator, such as a wearable defibrillator can have a heart rhythm detector to detect the heart rhythm of a patient. The defibrillator can also have a synchronous shock operating mode and an asynchronous shock operating mode. A controller can set the defibrillator in the synchronous shock operating mode or the asynchronous shock operating mode. The defibrillator can also include a shock module to cause the defibrillator to deliver shock therapy to the patient according to the operating mode of the defibrillator and a sync module configured to identify a first portion of the heart rhythm detected from a first ECG lead with which to time the delivery of the shock therapy to the patient when the operating mode of the defibrillator is in synchronous shock operating mode. A comparator module can compare timing of a QRS complex detected from the first ECG lead with the timing of the QRS complex detected by the second EGG lead.