Deflector Placement in Charged-Particle Beam Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electron beam lithographic systems face challenges in correcting deflection aberrations and oblique incidence without increasing the electrode length or reducing the diameter of the second deflector, which can lead to contamination and charging issues, and higher deflection voltage is detrimental to throughput.

Innovation Solution

The second deflector is placed ahead of the demagnifying lens, allowing the demagnifying lens to magnify the angle of deflection, thereby reducing the required deflection voltage and preventing adverse effects on deflection speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the electrode length of the second deflector is increased to correct deflection aberrations, then the deflection aberration correction improves, but the device complexity and contamination risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection aberration correctionVSAvoidelectrode length
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement by placing the second deflector in a different position relative to the demagnifying lens, utilizing the magnification of deflection angle to achieve the same correction effect with a more compact electrode configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the inside diameter of the electrode of the second deflector is reduced to correct deflection aberrations, then the deflection aberration correction improves, but the contamination and charging effects worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection aberration correctionVSAvoidcontamination and charging effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement by placing the second deflector in a different position relative to the demagnifying lens, utilizing the magnification of deflection angle to achieve the same correction effect with a more compact electrode configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters by reducing the deflection voltage of the second deflector while maintaining correction effectiveness through the altered spatial configuration, thereby reducing harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the deflection voltage of the second deflector is increased to correct deflection aberrations, then the deflection aberration correction improves, but the throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection aberration correctionVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters by reducing the deflection voltage of the second deflector while maintaining correction effectiveness through the altered spatial configuration, thereby preserving high throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If the second deflector is placed behind the demagnifying lens, then the deflection aberration correction is effective, but the deflection speed is adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection aberration correctionVSAvoiddeflection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement by placing the second deflector ahead of the demagnifying lens rather than behind it, utilizing the lens to magnify the deflection angle and enable lower voltage operation that preserves deflection speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively corrects deflection aberrations without increasing the electrode length or reducing the diameter of the second deflector, minimizing contamination risks and maintaining high throughput by lowering the deflection voltage.

Implementation Method 1

the demagnifying lens to magnify the angle of deflection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLens magnification: Lens

Implementation Method 2

a first deflector located behind the demagnifying lens and determining a beam position on the surface of the workpiece irradiated with the beam, and a second deflector located ahead of the demagnifying lens and canceling out deflection aberrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic deflection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7521688B2Charged-particle beam instrument
Publication Date: 2009.04.21 JEOL LTD
  • US7521688B2 patent drawing
  • US7521688B2 patent drawing
  • US7521688B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A charged-particle beam instrument is offered which can cancel out deflection aberrations arising from a first deflector or oblique incidence on the surface of a workpiece without (i) increasing the electrode length, (ii) reducing the inside diameter of the electrode, or (iii) increasing the deflection voltage too much. The instrument has an electron source for producing an electron beam, a demagnifying lens for condensing the beam, an objective lens for focusing the condensed beam onto the surface of the workpiece, the first deflector located behind the demagnifying lens, and a second deflector located ahead of the demagnifying lens. The first deflector determines the beam position on the surface of the workpiece. The second deflector cancels out deflection aberrations arising from the first deflector.