Deformable Glazing Frame for Slim Woodwork Glass Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing glazed openings in joinery, such as windows and doors, face issues with large, noticeable frames that limit glazing area and provide insufficient clamping force, leading to potential glazing retraction and aesthetic compromises.

Innovation Solution

A deformable frame design with groove and rebate cheeks that allow glazing insertion and retention, using locking means to secure the glazing without adhesives, and a thermal break for adaptability and sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a glazing bead is used to clamp the glass edge, then the glass is secured in place, but the frame becomes thick and noticeable, limiting the glazing area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglass retentionVSAvoidglazing area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into two functional parts: rebate cheeks that overlap and secure the glass edge, and groove cheeks that receive the glazing bead. This segmentation allows the clamping function to be distributed, enabling a thinner overall frame profile while maintaining glass retention reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-plane clamping approach to a multi-dimensional configuration where rebate cheeks overlap the glass edge in one dimension while groove cheeks receive the bead in another dimension. This dimensional redistribution allows for reduced frame thickness without compromising glass security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If a thick frame is used to provide sufficient rigidity for large openings, then the frame can support large glass panes, but the frame becomes noticeable and unsightly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rigidityVSAvoidglazing area
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure is segmented into rebate cheeks and groove cheeks with distinct functional roles. The rebate cheeks provide the necessary overlap and structural support for rigidity, while the groove cheeks accommodate the glazing bead. This segmentation allows the frame to achieve sufficient strength for large openings while maintaining a slimmer, less noticeable profile that maximizes glazing area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If snap-fit mechanisms are used to secure the glazing, then assembly is simplified, but the clamping force is localized and insufficient under wind load, leading to glazing retraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidglazing retention under load
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The securing mechanism is segmented into rebate cheeks that provide continuous overlap and support along the glass edge, and groove cheeks that receive the glazing bead. This segmentation distributes the clamping force along the entire length of the glass edge rather than at localized snap-fit points, preventing glazing retraction under wind load while maintaining assembly simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the frame are given different local qualities: rebate cheeks are designed to overlap and provide continuous support, while groove cheeks are designed to receive and secure the glazing bead. This local differentiation ensures that each part contributes optimally to overall glazing retention, providing distributed clamping force that resists wind loads effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Area of stationary object

If the frame profile is made thinner to increase glazing area, then more light enters the room, but the frame lacks sufficient rigidity to secure large glass panes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglazing areaVSAvoidframe rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into rebate cheeks that overlap the glass edge to provide structural support and rigidity, and groove cheeks that receive the glazing bead. This segmentation allows the frame to maintain a thin profile for maximum glazing area while the overlapping rebate cheeks provide the necessary rigidity to secure large glass panes effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances glazing retention, reduces frame visibility, increases glazed area, and simplifies installation and maintenance, while accommodating glazing thickness variations.

Implementation Method 1

the body is deformable such that second portions of the cheeks, called groove cheeks, can be brought closer together under the effect of an external force, thereby moving the rebate cheeks apart to allow the glazing to be installed in the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

means for locking the groove cheeks in the holding position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP4707519A1Glazing woodwork element, woodwork comprising such a woodwork element and method for manufacturing such a woodwork element
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 MILLET PORTES & FENETRES
  • EP4707519A1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4707519A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4707519A1 patent drawingFigure 3(A)~3(G)

AI summary

The invention relates in particular to a joinery element (1) comprising a glazing (20) mounted in a frame of which at least one side is formed by a body (100) having two cheeks (110, 120) of which first parts, called rebate cheeks (110A, 120A), overlap an edge of the glazing (20). According to the invention, the body (100) is deformable such that second portions of the cheeks (110, 120), called groove cheeks (110B, 120B), can be brought closer together under the effect of an external force so as to move the rebate cheeks (110A, 120A) apart to allow the glazing (20) to be placed in the body (100). The cheeks (110, 120) return to a holding position in the absence of force, in which the glazing (20) is held between the rebate cheeks (110A, 120A). Means for locking the groove cheeks (110B, 120B) in the holding position are provided.