Deformable Insert Flow Restriction Device for Well Bore Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety devices in well bores, such as blowout preventers, may fail or experience breaches, leading to hydrocarbon leakage and potential catastrophic explosions, and existing flow restriction methods, like collapsible casing devices, face challenges in withstanding well pressure and ensuring reliable sealing.

Innovation Solution

A flow restriction device comprising a deformable insert with a support structure that resists internal pressure, combined with pressure generating materials and triggers, to deform and reduce the well bore diameter, allowing for tailored deformation and enhanced flow restriction, including a bypass mechanism to further restrict flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a deformable insert with high strength is used to withstand well pressure, then the insert can protect explosive material from compression, but the insert cannot be deformed sufficiently to achieve effective flow restriction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert strengthVSAvoidflow restriction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two functional components: a strong insert support structure that withstands well pressure, and a separate deformable insert wall section that deforms to restrict flow. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert support acts as an intermediary between the explosive charge and the deformable insert wall section. It transmits the explosive force to deform the insert while protecting it from premature compression by well pressure, enabling controlled deformation on demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the deformable insert is made with properties conducive to deformation, then flow restriction is achieved, but the insert cannot withstand well pressure without deforming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow restriction effectivenessVSAvoidpressure resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the pressure-resisting function (insert support) from the flow-restriction function (deformable insert wall section). The insert support provides the necessary strength to withstand well pressure, while the insert wall section is optimized for deformation to achieve flow restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert support pre-resists well pressure before the explosive charge is activated, maintaining the insert in its original configuration during normal operation. When needed, the explosive charge overcomes this pre-resistance to induce controlled deformation for flow restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a blowout preventer is used to seal the well, then flow can be contained, but the device is complex and mounted on the wellhead making it vulnerable to breach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell sealing capabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformable insert acts as a flexible internal element that can be deformed to restrict flow. This simpler flexible mechanism is contained within the wellbore rather than being a complex wellhead-mounted system, reducing vulnerability while maintaining sealing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex mechanical closure system from the wellhead (top-down approach), this invention uses an internal deformable insert activated by explosive charge (bottom-up approach) to restrict flow from within the wellbore, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If the insert deforms under well pressure, then sealing may be improved, but uncontrolled deformation occurs leading to loss of mechanical property control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidmechanical property control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The insert support is pre-configured to resist well pressure and maintain the insert in its original configuration during normal operation. This preliminary action prevents uncontrolled deformation while allowing controlled deformation when the explosive charge is activated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides mechanical feedback through the insert support-resist-deform cycle. The insert support continuously monitors and resists well pressure, providing feedback that maintains mechanical property control until the explosive charge overcomes this resistance to induce controlled deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively limits deformation by well pressure, allowing for controlled reduction of well bore diameter and improved sealing, reducing the risk of hydrocarbon leakage and enhancing safety by providing flexible mechanical properties and additional flow restriction mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

at least one pressure generating material portion adapted in use, to generate a deformation force in response to an activation signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure generation from material decomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 2

when the flow restriction device is exposed to an internal throughbore pressure, a force generated on the deformable insert inner surface by the internal throughbore pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure resistance: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10138705B2Flow restriction device for well bore
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 SPEX GRP HLDG LTD
  • US10138705B2 patent drawing
  • US10138705B2 patent drawing
  • US10138705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flow restriction device for restricting flow through a conduit.