Deformable Recoil Absorber for Unmanned Ground Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recoil management systems for devices like projected water disruptors are not well-suited for unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) due to excessive weight and bulk, and they struggle to absorb large shock impulses effectively.

Innovation Solution

A recoil management system comprising a rigid structure with a deformable recoil absorber (DRA) that indirectly transfers impulse forces, using a semi-rigid material like metal foil or honeycomb structure to absorb and modify recoil forces, preventing damage to supporting structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional recoil management systems are used, then recoil forces are absorbed, but the system becomes excessively heavy and bulky for UGVs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil absorption capabilityVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The recoil management system is divided into discrete modular components: a deformable recoil absorber (DRA) structure, a constraining structure with removable interfaces, and an impulse force coupler. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and enables easy replacement of the DRA structure after use, reducing overall system weight while maintaining effective recoil absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The DRA structure is designed as a sacrificial, disposable component that absorbs recoil energy through controlled deformation and is then replaced. This approach eliminates the need for heavy, complex reusable shock absorption systems, significantly reducing system weight and bulk while effectively managing recoil forces from high-impulse devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Force

If heavy-duty recoil management systems are used, then large shock impulses are absorbed, but the system bulk increases making it unsuitable for UGVs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock impulse absorptionVSAvoidsystem volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The DRA structure utilizes thin-walled deformable geometries (such as crushed canisters or folded metal structures) that collapse under recoil loading to absorb large shock impulses. These thin-film-based structures achieve high energy absorption in compact volumes, avoiding the bulk associated with traditional heavy-duty recoil management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages recoil by changing the physical state and geometry of the DRA structure during impulse absorption. The DRA transitions from an undeformed state to a collapsed/deformed state, converting kinetic energy into deformation work. This parameter change approach allows compact volume while absorbing large shock impulses effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If a deformable recoil absorber structure is used, then recoil forces are absorbed through deformation, but the structure needs to be replaced after use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpulse force absorptionVSAvoidstructure replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the sacrificial DRA structure from the permanent constraining structure through removable interfaces. This segmentation allows the DRA to be easily replaced without replacing the entire recoil management system, improving ease of repair while maintaining effective impulse force absorption through the replaceable DRA component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The DRA structure is designed to be discarded after absorbing recoil energy through deformation, while the constraining structure and impulse force coupler are recovered and reused. This approach maintains high impulse absorption capability through replacement while minimizing waste and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively absorbs and modifies recoil forces, reducing peak magnitude and duration, thereby protecting supporting structures from damage while maintaining a lightweight and compact design suitable for UGVs.

Implementation Method 1

a deformable recoil absorber (DRA) structure made from a semi-rigid material that is configured to be deformed in response to an impulse force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The DRA structure is comprised of a semi-rigid material. The material is permanently deformable so that it will remain in a deformed state after being acted upon by the impulse force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through material deformation: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3726177B1Recoil management
Publication Date: 2022.11.30 EAGLE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • EP3726177B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3726177B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3726177B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A recoil managed disruptor (102) includes a disruptor device (102) having a barrel (104) from which a slug of material is fired. A piston (106) is mechanically coupled to the disruptor device (102). A housing (109) which supports the disruptor (102) on a positioning device includes a deformable recoil absorber, a.k.a. DRA (112) constraint (108). The DRA constraint (108) is configured to receive a sacrificial DRA structure (112) comprised of a semi-rigid material. The piston (106) is responsive to a recoil force produced when the disruptor device (102) is fired to travel along an axial length of the housing (109) and permanently deform the DRA structure (112) within the DRA constraint (108).