Deformable Vehicle Seat Backrest Panel for Spinal Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle seats lack the ability to dynamically adjust to the changing posture and spinal orientation of passengers, providing inadequate lumbar support and comfort during long journeys.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle seat with a deformable back-support panel and a panel-motion controller that includes motor-driven and yieldable spring mechanisms, allowing the panel to actively and passively change shape in response to passenger movements, providing customized spinal column support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a rigid backrest is used, then structural stability is maintained, but adaptability to different passenger postures and spinal orientations is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to passenger postureVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest is designed as a deformable panel that can dynamically change its shape and curvature to adapt to different passenger postures and spinal orientations. The panel transitions from a rigid static structure to a dynamic flexible structure that responds to passenger movements and preferences, resolving the contradiction between structural stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The backrest panel's physical parameters such as curvature, angle, and shape are made variable through motor-driven mechanisms and spring systems. These parameters can be adjusted actively by the passenger or automatically in response to detected posture changes, enabling the backrest to maintain both structural integrity and adaptability to different seating configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual adjustment mechanisms are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation and responsiveness to posture changes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of posture adjustmentVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest system incorporates sensors that automatically detect passenger posture and spinal orientation, then autonomously adjust the panel configuration without requiring manual input from the passenger. This self-service capability enhances ease of operation while the automated control algorithms manage the complexity of multiple adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to continuously monitor passenger posture and provides real-time feedback to the control mechanisms. This feedback loop enables automatic adjustments that respond dynamically to posture changes, improving ease of operation while the control system manages the complexity of coordinating multiple actuators and springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If active motor-driven control is implemented, then responsiveness to passenger commands is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to posture changesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor-driven system operates periodically rather than continuously, activating only when posture adjustments are needed based on sensor detection or passenger input. The system alternates between active motor-driven adjustment phases and passive maintenance phases, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining fast response capability when adjustment is required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Yieldable springs are introduced as intermediary elements between the motor-driven control system and the backrest panel. These springs store and release mechanical energy, allowing the system to maintain position and respond to minor posture changes passively without continuous motor activation, thereby reducing energy consumption while preserving rapid response capability through the stored elastic energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If a deformable panel is used, then adaptability to spinal orientation is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to spinal orientationVSAvoidpanel deformation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest panel is divided into multiple independently controllable segments or zones that can be adjusted to different positions and angles. This segmentation allows each zone to be manufactured with standard precision while the collective arrangement of segments provides the complex deformation patterns needed for spinal orientation adaptability, reducing overall manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deformable panel is designed with universal joints and standardized connection points that allow a single panel design to achieve multiple deformation configurations. This multi-functionality enables the panel to adapt to various spinal orientations through different combinations of the same structural elements, reducing the need for highly precise custom manufacturing for each possible posture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the seat to adaptively adjust lumbar support and posture, enhancing passenger comfort by dynamically changing shape to suit the passenger's spinal orientation and movements, ensuring proper pressure distribution and support throughout various postures.

Implementation Method 1

The shape-control link includes a yieldable spring made of an elastic material and is configured to yield elastically when the deformable back-support panel has assumed the selected shape during exposure of the deformable back-support panel to rearwardly directed forces applied by the seated passenger during a change in posture of the seated passenger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2325040B1Controllable comfort shell for vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2018.01.03 FAURECIA AUTOMOTIVE SEATING LLC
  • EP2325040B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2325040B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2325040B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A vehicle scat includes a seat back having a backrest, a backrest support, and a linkage arranged to interconnect the backrest and the backrest support. The linkage is configured to support the backrest for movement relative to the backrest support.