Plastically Deformable Wheel Yoke for Side Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current designs for vehicle wheel yokes either deform the spindle or destabilize structural elements during side impacts, leading to costly repairs and potential wheel failure, especially at high speeds.

Innovation Solution

A yoke with a U-shaped section and triangular side wings featuring a deformable zone of reduced resistance, allowing plastic deformation upon impact to modify the wheel camber, thereby distributing stress without compromising structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the spindle or structural element is designed to be rigid, then the wheel mounting stability is improved, but the cost of repair increases and the risk of wheel failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel mounting stabilityVSAvoidrisk of wheel failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The yoke is designed with differentiated local properties: the support plate and upper portions maintain high rigidity for stable wheel mounting, while the lower portions of the side wings contain plastic deformation zones that can yield under extreme impact. This local quality differentiation allows the structure to be both stable during normal operation and fail safely under exceptional conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The yoke structure is segmented into distinct functional zones: a rigid support plate for mounting stability, stiffening strips for structural reinforcement, and controlled plastic deformation zones for energy absorption. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the yoke is designed with high rigidity, then the structural integrity is improved, but the ability to absorb impact energy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidimpact energy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful effect of impact energy into a beneficial controlled deformation process. The plastic deformation zones are specifically designed to absorb impact energy through controlled yielding, transforming the harmful kinetic energy from side impacts into useful plastic work that protects the wheel and other critical components from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The material parameters of the yoke are changed spatially: the lower portions of the side wings have reduced thickness or modified material properties to create controlled plastic deformation zones, while the upper portions maintain high strength. This parameter variation allows the structure to exhibit both rigidity and energy absorption capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the side wings are made thick and rigid, then the manufacturing strength is improved, but the plastic deformation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing strengthVSAvoidplastic deformation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The side wings are designed with local quality variations: thick and rigid in the upper portions for manufacturing strength and structural support, but with reduced thickness or modified geometry in the lower portions to enable controlled plastic deformation. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between needing strength for manufacturing and deformation capability for impact absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The yoke design effectively absorbs side impacts by deforming plastically, reducing the risk of wheel failure and associated repair costs while maintaining structural rigidity, thus enhancing safety and reducing maintenance expenses.

Implementation Method 1

each side wing comprises a zone of reduced resistance which deforms plastically when a side impact is applied to the lower part of the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3303027B1Plastically deformable shell for mounting a wheel of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 RENAULT SA
  • EP3303027B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3303027B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a shell (100), for mounting a wheel of a motor vehicle onto a structural or suspension element of a motor vehicle, which has a U-shaped cross-section and comprises: a wheel support plate (10) having an overall vertical orientation and two triangular side flanges (12) that are parallel and orthogonal to the plane of the support plate (10), each of which is defined by a first vertical side (22) adjacent to the support plate (10), a second substantially horizontal bottom side (24), and a third side (26). The invention is characterized in that each side flange (18) comprises an area (34, 44) of reduced resistance that deforms plastically when a side impact is applied to the bottom portion of the wheel, in a transverse direction (T) relative to the plane of the wheel.