Vertical Fixed Bed Degasser Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing degassing methods for polyolefins in vertical fixed bed reactors face challenges in maintaining polymer quality and preventing blockages, as they cannot effectively control the residual polymerization activity and temperature, leading to suboptimal product stability and increased costs due to unconverted monomers and low-volatility compounds.

Innovation Solution

A process for operating a vertical fixed bed degasser involves introducing a stripping gas with 5-60% principal monomer, maintaining temperatures within 20 degrees Celsius of the polymerization reactor temperature, and controlling flowability and density to prevent polymer sintering, ensuring efficient degassing and product stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If prior art degassing conditions are used to favor post-polymerisation in vertical fixed bed degassers, then residual monomer removal is improved, but polymer quality deteriorates and degasser blockage occurs due to melting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual monomer contentVSAvoidpolymer quality stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling temperature (maintaining within ±20°C of polymerization temperature) and stripping gas composition (5-60% monomer content) to achieve effective degassing while preventing polymer melting and maintaining product quality stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through continuous monitoring and adjustment of temperature and stripping gas flow rates based on polymer characteristics and residual activity, ensuring optimal degassing conditions are maintained without causing blockages or quality deterioration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of substance

If higher temperatures are used in degasser to enhance degassing, then residual compound removal is improved, but polymer sintering and blockage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow-volatility compound removalVSAvoidpolymer sintering and blockage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by optimizing temperature control to maintain it within a narrow range (±20°C of polymerization temperature) rather than using high temperatures, thereby achieving compound removal through controlled stripping while preventing sintering and blockage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces stripping gas as an intermediary medium to facilitate the removal of residual compounds and monomers through mass transfer, eliminating the need for high temperature heating that would cause sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If stripping gas with high monomer content is used to enhance post-polymerisation, then residual monomer conversion is improved, but temperature control becomes difficult and blockage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonomer conversion efficiencyVSAvoidtemperature control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing stripping gas composition to contain 5-60% monomer and controlling the addition rate to maintain exothermic reaction heat within acceptable limits, thereby achieving effective monomer conversion while maintaining stable temperature control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by introducing monomer-containing stripping gas at controlled rates rather than using pure monomer, achieving sufficient post-polymerisation conversion while preventing excessive heat generation and temperature runaway

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces residual monomers and low-volatility compounds, preventing blockages and maintaining polymer quality, resulting in stable and constant polyolefin production with improved whiteness and reduced environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

the degassing process comprises the introduction into said degasser of a stripping gas comprising from 5 to 60% by volume of principal monomer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 2

effectively reduces residual monomers and low-volatility compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass transfer: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

the degassing conditions are selected such that the temperature inside the degasser is maintained within a range of temperatures comprised between the polymerisation reactor temperature plus or minus 20 degrees centigrade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal control: Temperature Gradient

Implementation Method 4

the polymerisation conditions in the degasser are such that there is produced an additional amount of polymer corresponding to between 0.001 and 0.015 times the amount which entered the degasser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP2768870B1Polymer degassing process control
Publication Date: 2018.01.10 INEOS EUROPE AG
  • EP2768870B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2768870B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2768870B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for operating a vertical fixed bed polymer powder degasser.