Degassing Tank Cap Locking Shell to Prevent Coolant Tampering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unskilled users may attempt to top off coolant in a vehicle's cooling circuit, potentially masking coolant leaks and risking contact with batteries, leading to dangerous situations.

Innovation Solution

An anti-tampering device is designed to secure the cap of a degassing tank, using locking mechanisms that prevent unskilled users from opening the tank, thereby deterring coolant adjustments and reducing the risk of battery-related hazards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the degassing tank cap is made removable for coolant adjustment, then ease of operation is improved, but safety deteriorates due to risk of unskilled user tampering and battery contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant adjustment accessibilityVSAvoidunskilled user tampering risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cap assembly is segmented into multiple functional components: the cap itself, a protective shell surrounding the cap, and locking means that secure the shell to the tank neck. This segmentation allows the system to provide both accessibility (cap can be removed) and safety (shell and locking means prevent unauthorized access)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective shell acts as an intermediary element between the user and the coolant system. It provides a physical barrier that prevents unskilled users from directly accessing the cap and coolant, while still allowing authorized service personnel to access the system when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the cap is made easily accessible for coolant topping, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential masking of coolant leaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant topping convenienceVSAvoidleak detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective shell and locking means are installed in advance to prevent unskilled users from adding coolant. This preliminary protective measure stops the harmful action of masking leaks before it can occur, while still allowing authorized personnel to perform legitimate coolant adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If protective measures are added to prevent unskilled user access, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunskilled user access preventionVSAvoidcap assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the protective system into a shell and locking means that can be attached to existing cap designs, the patent adds safety functionality without completely redesigning the cap assembly. This modular approach limits the increase in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective shell and locking means are designed to be universally applicable to different cap types and tank configurations. This multi-functionality allows a single protective solution to work across various applications, reducing the need for multiple specialized components and thereby limiting complexity increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230313731A1Anti-Tampering Device for a Degassing Tank Cap
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20230313731A1 patent drawing
  • US20230313731A1 patent drawing
  • US20230313731A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to an anti-tampering device (100, 200, 300, 400, 500) for securing a cap (103, 203, 303, 403, 503) onto a neck of a degassing tank of a vehicle cooling circuit, wherein the device comprises locking means that are either attached to a shell configured to surround and/or secure the cap on the neck (104, 204, 304), or attached to the cap and the neck (404, 504) of the tank. The device may comprise tamper-evident means (227′, 306) to provide evidence of unlocking the locking means. Additionally or alternatively, the device may be configured to be removed only by destruction such that once removed, it can no longer be reused.