Dehydrogenation Catalyst Stability via Aromatic Carrier Gas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dehydrogenation processes for alkanes and alkylbenzenes face challenges such as catalyst deactivation due to carbon formation, high energy consumption, and the need for expensive alloys to prevent corrosion, with steam usage being inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A dehydrogenation process using metallic sulfide catalysts in the presence of small amounts of hydrogen sulfide without forming H2S, employing aromatic hydrocarbons like benzene or toluene as carrier gases to maintain catalyst stability and improve energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If steam is used as carrier gas in dehydrogenation process, then heat transfer is improved, but energy consumption increases and catalyst stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical-chemical parameters of the carrier gas by replacing steam with aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene). These alternatives have higher heat capacity and lower heat of vaporization, providing superior heat transfer efficiency while reducing energy consumption for vaporization and condensation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs aromatic hydrocarbons that can be easily condensed and recycled after serving their purpose as heat carriers. This approach replaces expensive, energy-intensive steam generation with a more efficient, recyclable carrier system that reduces overall process energy demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Quantity of substance

If steam is used as carrier gas, then reaction medium is provided, but catalyst deactivation occurs due to carbon formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction medium availabilityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of carbon formation into a benefit by using aromatic hydrocarbons as carrier gases. These aromatic compounds suppress carbon deposition on the catalyst surface while maintaining the necessary reaction medium properties, thereby extending catalyst life and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If high temperature is used for dehydrogenation, then conversion rate is improved, but catalyst deactivation accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces aromatic hydrocarbons as intermediary carrier gases that mediate between the high temperature requirements for conversion and the catalyst stability requirements. These intermediaries provide thermal management and suppress direct carbon formation on the catalyst, enabling high conversion rates without accelerated deactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If expensive alloys are used for reactor materials, then corrosion resistance is improved, but process cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidprocess cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of carbon formation (which causes metal dusting corrosion) into a benefit by using aromatic hydrocarbon carrier gases that suppress carbon deposition. This eliminates the need for expensive corrosion-resistant alloys, thereby reducing capital costs while maintaining reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains high catalyst stability, reduces energy consumption, and eliminates the need for steam, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective process for producing unsaturated chemical products like styrene from ethylbenzene.

Implementation Method 1

The dehydrogenation is conducted catalytically by contacting the alkanes, alkenes or alkylbenzenes with a metallic sulfide (MeS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), yet where no hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical equilibrium:

Data Source

PatentEP3201162B1Dehydrogenation of alkanes to alkenes
Publication Date: 2020.04.15 HALDOR TOPSOE AS
  • EP3201162B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3201162B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3201162B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Process for dehydrogenation of alkanesor alkylbenzenes by using metal sulfide catalyst under the presence of small amounts of hydrogen sulfide.