Flexible Deice Boot Vortex Generators for Wing Ice Shedding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ice buildup on aircraft wings exacerbates stall conditions by increasing the critical angle of attack, leading to flow separation, decreased lift, and increased drag, which complicates control and balance, especially in adverse weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a deice boot with protrusions, such as vortex generators, on the leading edge of the wing, constructed from flexible materials like neoprene rubber, which inflate and deflate to shed ice and feature a ramped upper face and laterally converging sides to minimize flow separation, particularly at stall conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a deice boot is used to remove ice buildup, then ice shedding is improved, but flow separation increases at stall conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice buildupVSAvoidflow separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The deice boot is segmented into multiple spanwise inflatable tubes that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows different sections to be inflated at different times, creating a more controlled ice shedding pattern that reduces turbulent flow separation compared to a single large inflatable structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vortex generator protrusions are pre-positioned on the deice boot surface before inflation occurs. These protrusions create controlled vortices in advance that energize the boundary layer, preventing flow separation before it can occur during the ice shedding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the deice boot is inflated to shed ice, then ice removal is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice contaminationVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The deice boot operates through periodic inflation and deflation cycles rather than remaining continuously inflated. This periodic action allows the wing to maintain optimal aerodynamic performance during deflation phases while achieving ice removal during brief inflation periods, thus preserving overall aerodynamic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Vortex generators are positioned to create beneficial flow patterns before the aircraft reaches stall conditions. This preliminary aerodynamic conditioning ensures that when ice shedding occurs, the flow remains attached and aerodynamic performance is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If protrusions are added to the deice boot to minimize flow separation, then aerodynamic stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow attachmentVSAvoidboot structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusions are integrated into the flexible rubber boot material itself rather than being separate rigid components. This allows the protrusions to flex and deform with the boot during inflation and deflation cycles, maintaining structural simplicity while achieving the aerodynamic function of flow separation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The vortex generator protrusions are merged with the deice boot structure, combining two functions (ice shedding and flow control) into a single integrated component. This eliminates the need for separate vortex generator devices and reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces flow separation and improves handling characteristics by maintaining attached airflow and preventing premature stalls due to ice buildup, ensuring stable aircraft control even in contaminated conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Deice boots include flexible sheets of rubber which are adhered to the leading edge of the wing and have span-wise inflatable tubes which are stitched into the rubber matting. When the tubes are inflated, the boot causes the accumulated ice to be pushed away from the leading edge surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The protrusion is adapted such that it minimizes flow separation from the wing, especially when the aircraft approaches stall conditions. Structurally speaking, this flow separation minimization, in one embodiment, is achieved by configuring the protrusions such that each has a ramped upper face and two laterally converging sides. In some embodiments the protrusions are vortex generators.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex generation: Vortex Generator

Data Source

PatentUS7900871B2Wing leading edge having vortex generators
Publication Date: 2011.03.08 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US7900871B2 patent drawing
  • US7900871B2 patent drawing
  • US7900871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement of devices as well as a method for improving the aerodynamics of an aircraft wing are disclosed. In embodiments, a plurality of vortex generators are attached in span-wise alignment on an deice boot along the wing's leading edge. The vortex generators are, in embodiments, constructed of a flexible material such that they are able to be expanded along with the boot during inflation and deflation thus mechanically involving the aerodynamic devices in the ice-shedding process.