Pneumatic Deicer Sensor Integration for Chamber Malfunction Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pneumatic deicers in aircraft face challenges with malfunction detection, as issues like holes in chambers or ice/water blockages in air lines can prevent inflation, and current methods require visual inspection to identify faulty chambers, leading to inefficiencies in ice removal and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

Integration of small, flexible sensors within each inflatable chamber to measure parameters like pressure, temperature, and humidity, allowing for real-time monitoring and quicker troubleshooting of malfunctioning chambers without visual inspection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspection is used to detect malfunctioning chambers, then device complexity is minimized, but measurement precision and detection accuracy are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalfunction detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deicer system is divided into multiple independent inflatable chambers, each equipped with its own sensor. This segmentation allows individual monitoring of each chamber's status, enabling precise detection of which specific chamber is malfunctioning without requiring complex system-wide inspection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors are introduced as intermediary devices that indirectly detect chamber malfunctions by measuring pressure, temperature, and humidity parameters. These sensors act as mediators between the physical state of the chamber and the monitoring system, providing accurate malfunction detection without requiring direct visual inspection or complex mechanical sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If sensors are integrated within each chamber, then malfunction detection accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeicer operational reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensors integrated within each chamber serve multiple functions: detecting pressure changes to identify holes, measuring temperature to detect ice formation, and monitoring humidity levels. This multi-functionality allows a single sensor system to provide comprehensive chamber status monitoring, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Each chamber essentially monitors its own status through the integrated sensor, providing self-diagnosis capability. The sensor detects when its host chamber is malfunctioning and communicates this information autonomously, reducing the need for external inspection systems and overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If visual inspection is required for troubleshooting, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but loss of time for maintenance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting timeVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system provides real-time feedback about chamber status to the monitoring system. When a chamber malfunctions, the sensor immediately detects the anomaly (pressure drop, temperature change, humidity shift) and communicates this information, enabling rapid troubleshooting and reducing maintenance time without requiring manual visual inspection of each chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and efficient identification of malfunctioning chambers, reducing the need for visual inspection and allowing for predictive maintenance, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of deicing operations.

Implementation Method 1

a base layer and a forming layer that together form a chamber that receives air by an air line to inflate the forming layer to increase the volume of the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

Within the inflatable chamber is at least one sensor... The sensors are able to accurately measure all or specific parameter like pressure, inflation height/displacement, vacuum (i.e., deflation height), temperature of the air, temperature of the base layer and/or forming layer, humidity of the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Data Source

PatentEP3428067B1Pneumatic deicer with sensors
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3428067B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3428067B1 patent drawingFigure 1C~1D
  • EP3428067B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A pneumatic deicer includes a base layer (20), a forming layer (26), a first chamber (36a), and a first sensor (42). The base layer (20) has an inlet (38), a first side (22), and a second side. The forming layer (26) is connected to the base layer (20) along at least two seams and has inner side (28) and an outer side (30) with the outer side (30) being distant from the base layer (20). The first chamber (36a) is formed between the base layer (20) and the forming layer (26) and configured to be inflated by air passing into the first chamber (36a) through the inlet (38) in the base layer (20). The first sensor (42) is situated within the first chamber (36a).