Deimmunized VNAR Scaffolds for Reduced Immunogenicity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shark VNAR domains pose a challenge for humanization due to structural differences and low sequence identity with human V domains, leading to immunogenicity issues when used therapeutically.

Innovation Solution

Deimmunization of VNAR scaffolds by identifying and removing human T-cell epitopes from MHC Class II binding sites through in silico analysis and subsequent amino acid substitutions, deletions, or insertions, maintaining the overall structure and antigen binding capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If VNAR scaffolds are used therapeutically, then high affinity and cross-reactivity with target antigens is achieved, but immunogenicity increases due to structural differences and low sequence identity with human V domains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidimmunogenicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making targeted amino acid substitutions specifically in framework regions 1, 2, and 4 of the VNAR scaffold while preserving the CDR regions. This localized modification approach reduces immunogenicity in specific areas without affecting the overall antigen-binding functionality of the variable domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by systematically altering the amino acid sequence parameters of the VNAR scaffold. Specific residues in framework regions are mutated to reduce similarity to shark-derived sequences and minimize MHC class II binding, thereby changing the immunogenic parameters while maintaining structural integrity and binding affinity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If framework residues are replaced to reduce immunogenicity, then MHC class II binding is reduced, but antigen binding capacity is dramatically lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMHC class II bindingVSAvoidantigen binding
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully distinguishes between framework regions and CDR regions, applying modifications only to framework regions 1, 2, and 4 while leaving the CDR regions intact. This localized approach ensures that antigen-binding properties are preserved while reducing immunogenic framework sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selecting specific residues within framework regions for mutation rather than replacing entire framework regions. This selective modification of key residues achieves sufficient reduction in MHC class II binding while minimizing impact on overall structure and antigen binding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If extensive paratope re-engineering is performed to maintain binding after framework replacement, then binding capacity is partially restored, but structural complexity and development time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget bindingVSAvoidparatope re-engineering
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-identifying and optimizing framework region residues before CDR grafting. The framework is engineered in advance to have reduced immunogenicity, which simplifies subsequent paratope optimization and reduces the need for extensive iterative re-engineering of the antigen-binding regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250122298A1Deimmunized VNAR domains and scaffolds
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 OSSIANIX INC
  • US20250122298A1 patent drawing
  • US20250122298A1 patent drawing
  • US20250122298A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to deimmunized VNAR scaffolds, methods of making the scaffolds and their use as frameworks, and VNAR domains comprising those scaffolds, especially therapeutic VNAR domains to a target antigen of interest, including, for example, high affinity VNAR domains that are cross reactive with primate transferrin receptors (“TfR”) as well as other VNAR domains capable of carrying a therapeutic or diagnostic cargo across the blood brain barrier.