Delay-Aware Logical Channel Prioritization for XR Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems struggle to efficiently prioritize and transmit delay-critical data for multi-modal traffic in extended reality (XR) applications, leading to potential delays and inefficiencies in delivering synchronized audio, video, and haptic data.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a delay-aware logical channel prioritization (LCP) procedure that considers both logical channel priority and data delay status, enhancing the UL scheduling process by prioritizing delay-critical data during resource allocation, and incorporating delay status reporting (DSR) to ensure timely delivery of urgent data packets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional logical channel prioritization is used, then simple priority-based scheduling is maintained, but delay-critical data for multi-modal traffic cannot be efficiently prioritized and transmitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery reliability of delay-critical dataVSAvoidcomplexity of scheduling procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the traditional single-parameter (logical channel priority) scheduling approach by introducing a second parameter (delay status) to create a multi-parameter prioritization mechanism. This allows the system to distinguish between delay-tolerant and delay-critical data, enabling reliable delivery of urgent multi-modal traffic while maintaining manageable scheduling complexity through structured parameter evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If delay-aware prioritization is implemented, then transmission efficiency of urgent data is improved, but processing complexity at the UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiency of delay-critical dataVSAvoidcomplexity of LCP procedure at UE
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE report delay status information to the network in advance, allowing the network to pre-configure prioritization rules and allocate resources accordingly. This advance preparation enables efficient transmission of delay-critical data without requiring complex real-time processing at the UE during actual data transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through delay status reporting mechanisms where the UE provides information about its delay-critical data to the network. This feedback loop enables the network to adjust scheduling decisions dynamically, improving transmission efficiency of urgent data while keeping UE processing requirements manageable through standardized feedback protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If delay status reporting is added, then timely delivery of urgent packets is ensured, but overhead for resource allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery time of urgent dataVSAvoidoverhead of DSR mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing delay status reporting selectively rather than universally - only for logical channels carrying delay-critical data. This approach ensures timely delivery of urgent packets while minimizing overhead by avoiding unnecessary reporting for delay-tolerant traffic, thus balancing performance improvement with overhead control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If multi-modal traffic is prioritized, then synchronization of audio, video, and haptic data is improved, but power consumption at UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization reliability of multi-modal dataVSAvoidpower consumption at UE
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing differentiated prioritization treatment for different types of data within multi-modal traffic. Instead of uniformly treating all data equally, the system applies enhanced prioritization only to delay-critical data streams (such as audio and haptic data), while maintaining normal handling for less time-sensitive data. This selective approach improves synchronization reliability for critical streams while minimizing additional power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250212051A1Techniques for delay-aware logical channel prioritization for multi-modal traffic
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US20250212051A1 patent drawing
  • US20250212051A1 patent drawing
  • US20250212051A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure relate to techniques for delay-aware logical channel prioritization for multi-modal traffic. A user equipment (UE) is configured to establish a logical channel based on a received configuration, the configuration comprising a logical channel priority for the logical channel, receive information for allocating resources for data transmission associated with the logical channel, determine a first parameter associated with data of the logical channel and a second parameter associated with data of the logical channel, and calculate a priority value for the data of the logical channel based at least in part on the first parameter, the second parameter, and the logical channel priority in response to determining that the first parameter is below a threshold.