Delayed Fin Deployment via Centrifugal Spring Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fin-stabilized projectiles lack a cost-effective, lightweight, and low-volume mechanism for delayed tail fin deployment, which is essential for avoiding interference with adjacent projectiles and mitigating boost-phase winds, without sacrificing reliability or requiring significant redesign.

Innovation Solution

A hold down device that uses a constant spring force to delay fin deployment until the projectile reaches a predetermined spin rate, allowing the centrifugal force to overcome the spring force and deploy the fins, with optional lanyard and cam mechanisms to ensure synchronized deployment and minimize dispersion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If immediate fin deployment is used, then stability is achieved quickly, but interference with adjacent rockets or helicopter flow field occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference with adjacent rockets or helicopter flow fieldVSAvoiddelay in achieving stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fin deployment mechanism is designed to deploy fins after a predetermined time delay following launch, allowing the rocket to clear the helicopter's flow field and adjacent rockets before fins are deployed. This preliminary timing action resolves the contradiction by scheduling the deployment event to occur after the harmful interference period has passed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If active-passive or active-active systems are used for delayed deployment, then deployment timing control is achieved, but cost, weight, and volume increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelayed deployment capabilityVSAvoidcost, weight, and volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the rocket's own rotational motion (spin) generated during flight to trigger fin deployment. A centrifugal force mechanism automatically deploys the fins when a predetermined spin rate is reached, eliminating the need for external timing circuits, batteries, or control systems. The rocket serves itself by using its inherent motion characteristics to control deployment timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The deployment mechanism responds to changes in the spin rate parameter. As the rocket accelerates rotationally during flight, the centrifugal force increases until it overcomes the restraining force of the fin retention mechanism, automatically triggering deployment. This parameter-based control avoids complex timing systems while achieving precise delayed deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If spring loading is used to deploy fins quickly, then deployment speed increases, but deployment occurs immediately without delay capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin deployment speedVSAvoidimmediate deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fin retention mechanism applies a restraining force (preliminary anti-action) that counteracts the spring loading and centrifugal force during the initial phase of flight. This restraint prevents immediate deployment despite the presence of strong deploying forces. Only after the predetermined time delay, when the spin rate generates sufficient centrifugal force to overcome the retention mechanism, does deployment occur rapidly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a reliable, inexpensive, and lightweight solution for delayed fin deployment that minimizes interference and allows projectiles to clear aircraft flow fields or multi-tube launchers, with minimal redesign requirements and reduced dispersion at the target.

Implementation Method 1

a spring means for exerting a constant force to hold the fin in the stowed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

When the spin rate reaches the target value, the rotational moment produced by the centrifugal force exceeds the opposing moment produced by the spring force and the hold down device releases the fin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2062006B1Delayed tail fin deployment mechanism and method
Publication Date: 2013.08.14 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP2062006B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2062006B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2062006B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A hold down device (100) positioned on the projectile to exert a known spring force in opposition to the centrifugal force provides an inexpensive, light weight and reliable delayed fin deployment mechanism for boosted fin-stabilized spinning projectiles. When the forcing moment produced by the centrifugal force acting on the fin (102) exceeds the opposing moment produced by the hold down device, the hold down device will release the fin allowing it to swing into its deployed position. Thus, proper selection of the spring force and positioning of the hold down device will cause the fins to deploy at a predetermined spin rate. The delayed deployment of multiple fins is attained by providing a plurality of like hold down devices or by providing a single hold down device that releases a lanyard (106) when deployed.