Delayed Fluid Loss Valve for Gravel Packing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid loss control valves in gravel pack systems require significant tensile force to close, leading to string recoil and induced flow that can draw sand into the wellbore, complicating gravel packing operations.

Innovation Solution

A redesigned fluid loss valve that separates surface signal from actual movement, allowing tension relief before valve closure, preventing sand influx by using a mechanism that retracts collets without string recoil and enabling selective closure under tension or release.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If significant tensile force is applied to close the fluid loss valve, then the valve can be reliably actuated, but the string recoils and induces flow that draws sand into the wellbore

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuation reliabilityVSAvoidsand influx into wellbore
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve actuation process is segmented into two distinct phases: first, applying tensile force to shear the pin and release the flapper; second, allowing the string to recoil and close the valve. This segmentation separates the reliable actuation mechanism from the harmful sand influx, allowing each phase to occur independently and controlably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pin is sheared and the flapper is released in advance before the string recoils to close the valve. This preliminary action ensures the valve is ready to close without inducing sand influx, as the closure occurs during the recoil phase rather than during the tensile force application phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the string is pulled up to close the valve, then the valve can be actuated, but the stretched string recoils and creates pressure reduction that draws sand into the annulus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve closure operationVSAvoidpressure reduction inducing sand influx
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The operation is segmented into releasing the flapper (first phase) and closing the valve (second phase). The flapper is released before the string recoils, so the closure occurs during the recoil phase rather than during the pulling phase, eliminating the harmful pressure reduction effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flapper acts as an intermediary mechanism between the tensile force application and the valve closure. It is released by the tensile force but does not close the valve immediately; instead, it allows the string to recoil and close the valve during the recoil phase, mediating between the pulling action and the closure action to eliminate sand influx.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the shear pin is sheared to release the flapper, then the valve can close, but the string stretches before the pin shears and recoils after shearing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve release reliabilityVSAvoidstring length stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The valve release process is segmented into two phases: first, applying tensile force to shear the pin and release the flapper; second, allowing the string to recoil and close the valve. This segmentation allows the string to stretch during the first phase (accepting the temporary instability) while ensuring the valve closes during the second phase when the string is in a stable, relaxed state, preventing sand influx.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Minimizes sand influx into the annulus during gravel packing, ensuring effective gravel deposition and preventing fluid loss, allowing for successful gravel pack operations without the complications of sand interference.

Implementation Method 1

The relative movement also freed the flapper to be biased by a pivot spring to go to the closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7823637B2Delayed acting gravel pack fluid loss valve
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US7823637B2 patent drawing
  • US7823637B2 patent drawing
  • US7823637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid loss valve is disposed in a wash pipe in a gravel packing assembly. It is preferably held open initially and when in the process it is time for the valve to be able to go closed a pulling force is applied that creates relative movement to either close the valve or allow it to close without release of the assembly when under tension. This allows a surface signal that the valve is to be released for closure. The tension is relieved before string movement with the valve can occur. This can happen by slacking off before picking up again or through other time delay features that allow the tension to be removed and a lock to collapse before a lift force is applied for subsequent gravel packing operations. The valve in its closed position acts to eliminate fluid loss when excess gravel is reversed out.