Delegate Delivery Scheduling via Calendar Conflict Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scheduling delivery of items that require a signature can be challenging due to difficulties in coordinating availability between delivery companies and recipients, often resulting in items being left in unsecured areas for extended periods.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes user and delegate electronic calendars to determine conflicts and availability, allowing for the scheduling of delivery to a delegate based on priority rules, location analysis, and notification systems to ensure secure and efficient delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If delivery requires recipient presence for signature, then delivery security is improved, but scheduling difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery securityVSAvoidscheduling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a delegate as an intermediary who receives delivery on behalf of the recipient. The system identifies authorized delegates from the recipient's contact list, checks their availability through calendar integration, and coordinates delivery to them. This mediator approach maintains security (authorized person receives) while solving scheduling conflicts (delegate may be available when recipient is not).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying authorized delegates and pre-checking their calendar availability before delivery arrival. The recipient designates delegates in advance, and the system proactively checks calendar conflicts and notifies both recipient and delegate about potential delivery timing issues before the delivery arrives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If item is left in unsecured area for extended periods, then recipient availability flexibility is improved, but security risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient availability flexibilityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops by continuously monitoring delegate availability through calendar integration and notifying the recipient of potential delivery conflicts. The recipient receives notifications about scheduled deliveries and can adjust or redirect them based on real-time availability information. This feedback mechanism prevents items from being left unattended by ensuring delivery occurs when an authorized person is actually available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts delivery scheduling based on real-time calendar data. Instead of static scheduling, the system checks current calendar availability of both recipient and delegates, allowing flexible rescheduling. This dynamic approach adapts to changing availability while maintaining security by ensuring delivery only occurs when an authorized person can be present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple delegates are contacted for delivery coordination, then delivery reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the delegate selection process into distinct hierarchical levels. The system divides delegates into different priority tiers (e.g., family members, friends, colleagues) and systematically checks availability in order of priority. This segmentation reduces complexity by providing a clear, structured approach to contacting multiple delegates rather than randomly or simultaneously contacting all contacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by assigning priority weights to different delegates and delivery time slots. Instead of treating all delegates equally, the system uses priority parameters to determine which delegate to contact first. It also adjusts timing parameters by checking calendar availability at different times and rescheduling based on availability windows, reducing the need to contact multiple delegates simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11093889B2Delegate item delivery
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11093889B2 patent drawing
  • US11093889B2 patent drawing
  • US11093889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, apparatuses and methods are provided herein useful to enable delivery to a delegate of a user. A calendar function of the user can be utilized to determine whether a delivery can be successfully completed. In several embodiments, a system as described herein can access wireless smart devices of the user and one or more delegates thereof to schedule a delivery of one or more products. The system analyzes locations and times of scheduled events to determine whether the user has a conflict for a delivery time and, if so, whether any of the delegates are authorized and available to receive the delivery. The system can send out notifications and/or invites based on priorities determined by the user.