Delegate Payment Authorization with Identity Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in controlling a delegate's spending when they are unable to make a purchase in person, as they have limited control over the delegate's use of their funds, leading to potential misuse.

Innovation Solution

A system where a user authorizes a delegate to make purchases by sending information such as the delegate's picture, merchant details, and transaction limitations to a payment provider, which generates a one-time code for the delegate to use, ensuring the delegate's identity is verified before processing the transaction, allowing the user to control spending through various restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a user gives a delegate a payment instrument or cash to make purchases on their behalf, then the delegate can make purchases without the user being present, but the user loses control over what the delegate can spend and on what

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAbility to make purchases without user presenceVSAvoidUser control over delegate spending
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The payment instrument is segmented into multiple components: a base card and separate disposable virtual accounts. Each virtual account has its own spending limits and restrictions, allowing the user to divide control into manageable segments rather than giving one large sum of control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The user performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring spending limits, merchant categories, and geographic restrictions on each virtual account before giving it to the delegate. This preliminary setup ensures control is established in advance, preventing misuse during the actual purchase process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a user provides detailed spending restrictions to a delegate, then user control over spending is improved, but the complexity of the payment system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUser control over delegate spendingVSAvoidPayment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The payment instrument acts as an intermediary between the user and delegate. It automatically enforces spending rules, limits, and restrictions without requiring complex communication or verification between user and delegate during transactions. The intermediary handles the complexity internally while presenting a simple interface to both parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating a complex custom payment system, the invention uses copies of existing payment technology (virtual accounts, spending limits, merchant categories) that already have built-in control mechanisms. These copied features are combined to achieve the desired control without redesigning the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If a user creates multiple virtual accounts with different spending limits, then control precision is improved, but the time required to set up and manage accounts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSpending control precisionVSAvoidTime to set up and manage accounts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The payment instrument system allows dynamic creation and modification of virtual accounts. Users can quickly create new virtual accounts on-demand with different spending limits and restrictions, and can modify existing accounts as needed. This dynamic capability reduces setup time compared to static pre-configured systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to change parameters (spending limits, merchant categories, geographic restrictions) of virtual accounts without recreating the entire account structure. This parameter flexibility enables precise control while minimizing the time investment required for setup and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10909518B2Delegation payment with picture
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 PAYPAL INC
  • US10909518B2 patent drawing
  • US10909518B2 patent drawing
  • US10909518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user who is authorizing a delegate to make a purchase using funds from an account of the user sends information to a payment provider. The information includes a picture of the delegate, along with information such as a merchant name, a maximum amount, a type of purchase, item information, and/or any other transaction limitations/restrictions. The payment provider then transmits this information to the merchant. A one-time code or number may be communicated to the delegate. When the delegate is ready to make a payment with the user account, the delegate gives the delegate's name and/or other identifying information to the merchant, along with the payment code. The merchant enters the information and is shown a picture of the delegate. If there is a match, the payment may be submitted for processing. In one embodiment, a photo of the delegate may be taken by the merchant and the image transmitted to the user. The user may then be requested to confirm the delegate as an authorized delegate.