Delegated Condo Project Review System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The review process for condo projects is time-consuming, delaying the ability of consumers to secure home ownership, and there is a need for a system that facilitates investor acceptance and allows lenders to delegate the review responsibility.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system with a database and user interfaces for lenders and investors, enabling lenders to add and edit project information, and investors to track and accept projects, with features for lender-delegated reviews, automated risk assessment, and report generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If investors conduct manual reviews of condo projects, then project acceptance criteria can be thoroughly evaluated, but the review process becomes time-consuming and delays home ownership

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveproject acceptance criteria evaluationVSAvoidreview process time

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables lenders to self-review condo projects against investor criteria using automated tools and templates, eliminating the need for manual investor review while maintaining evaluation reliability. Lenders input project data that is automatically assessed against predetermined criteria.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual investor review processes are replaced with an automated electronic system that uses computer-based criteria evaluation, databases, and interfaces to assess project eligibility, thereby reducing review time while maintaining thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If lenders review every condo project individually, then loan quality can be controlled, but loan origination costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveloan quality controlVSAvoidloan origination cost

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal database and template structure that can be applied across multiple projects, allowing lenders to efficiently review multiple condo projects using the same standardized criteria and tools, thereby controlling costs while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Lenders use self-service tools and automated templates to conduct their own project reviews, eliminating the need for expensive external consulting or manual investor review, thereby reducing origination costs while maintaining loan quality control.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If investors delegate review responsibility to lenders, then review efficiency improves, but investor oversight capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvereview efficiencyVSAvoidinvestor oversight capability

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where lenders input project data that is automatically evaluated against investor criteria, and results are transmitted back to investors for final approval. This maintains investor oversight while improving review efficiency through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An automated electronic system acts as an intermediary between investors and lenders, handling the review process while maintaining investor control through the system's criteria-based evaluation and reporting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If comprehensive project information is collected and stored, then future loan processing becomes faster, but data management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvefuture loan processing speedVSAvoiddata management complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The database is segmented into organized categories (project information, lender information, investor criteria, etc.) with structured fields and templates, making data management systematic and reducing complexity while enabling fast future processing.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Data collection templates and database structures are prepared in advance with all necessary fields and categories pre-defined, so that when projects are reviewed, information is captured efficiently in the correct format, reducing future processing time without increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7801809B1System and method for management of delegated real estate project reviews

Publication Date: 2010.09.21 FANNIE MAE

AI summary

A data processing system comprises a database, lender user interface logic, and investor user interface logic. The database is configured to store information regarding a plurality of condo projects, including projects which are under development and projects which are completed. The lender user interface logic provides the lenders with access to the database to permit the lenders to add information in the database concerning the plurality of condo projects. The investor interface logic is configured to accept a real estate project with which one or more lenders are involved and configured to permit the investor to track the information added in the database by the lenders.