Delegated Signing via Sensitivity Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document management systems struggle to securely distribute sensitive documents between entities while preventing unauthorized access, especially when substituting receiving entities are involved.

Innovation Solution

A centralized document system that determines the sensitivity level of documents using a machine-learned model combining document and entity attributes, and applies policies to decide whether to delegate sensitive documents, thereby preventing unauthorized access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system distributes sensitive documents to substitute receiving entities, then document execution can proceed when the original recipient is unavailable, but sensitive information security is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument execution efficiencyVSAvoidsensitive information exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized document system acts as an intermediary between the originating entity and substitute receiving entities. It receives delegation requests, evaluates sensitivity using machine-learned models, checks organizational policies, and makes the final decision on whether to permit distribution. This intermediary role resolves the contradiction by introducing a security gatekeeper that enables document execution only when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary sensitivity analysis and policy evaluation before distributing documents to substitute recipients. By applying machine-learned models to assess document sensitivity and checking organizational policies in advance, the system prevents sensitive information exposure before it can occur, while still allowing legitimate document execution to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system scans each document for sensitive information, then sensitive documents can be identified and protected, but processing resources are consumed significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitive information detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of sensitivity analysis from a universal scan of all documents to a selective analysis based on document attributes and distribution context. By using machine-learned models that evaluate multiple parameters (document type, recipient role, organizational policy, delegation necessity), the system achieves high detection accuracy only when needed, significantly reducing processing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system applies machine-learned models to all documents, then sensitivity detection accuracy is maximized, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using machine-learned models selectively rather than universally. It applies the models only to documents that meet certain criteria (e.g., when delegation is involved, when document attributes suggest potential sensitivity). This partial application maintains high detection accuracy for relevant cases while minimizing processing time for the overall document flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system permits delegation to substitute receiving entities, then document execution flexibility is improved, but unauthorized access risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument distribution flexibilityVSAvoidauthorization security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously evaluating delegation requests against organizational policies, document sensitivity levels, and recipient authorization status. The machine-learned models provide feedback on the risk level of each delegation request, and the system adjusts its decisions based on this feedback. This creates a dynamic security system that maintains flexibility while preventing unauthorized access through continuous monitoring and evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250200219A1Delegated signing using sensitivity classification
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 DOCUSIGN INC
  • US20250200219A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200219A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200219A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A centralized document system generates a document package in response to a request by an originating entity. The document package includes at least one document for execution by a first receiving entity. The first receiving entity can specify a set of permissions for a second receiving entity to perform actions to documents within the package on behalf of the first receiving entity. Accordingly, the system may provide the document package to both the first and second receiving entities for the first receiving entity to execute the at least one document. Before providing the document to the second receiving entity, system may determine whether there is a sensitive document in the package and whether to delegate the document to the second entity. Accordingly, the system may prevent a sensitive document package from being provided to the second receiving entity for execution.