Delivery Loss Mitigation via Observer-Validated Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The last mile of delivery services often experiences misdeliveries due to errors or missing information on address labels, leading to additional waiting time and financial burdens for both recipients and retailers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that allows observers to report misdeliveries, validates incorrect locations, and provides recipients with selectable remediation actions, such as redelivery or refund options, to mitigate losses and ensure items reach their intended destinations efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the retailer resends the goods to the recipient, then the item can reach the correct destination, but additional waiting time is incurred and financial responsibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery accuracyVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting misdeliveries through observer reports and validation mechanisms before the full remediation process begins. The system pre-determines available remediation actions and presents them to the recipient, enabling faster response compared to traditional manual investigation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where observer reports trigger automated validation, which then determines remediation actions and notifies the recipient. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures timely detection and resolution of misdeliveries, reducing waiting time while maintaining delivery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the retailer resends the goods to the recipient, then the item can reach the correct destination, but financial responsibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery accuracyVSAvoidfinancial responsibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing observers to report misdeliveries and by providing recipients with selectable remediation actions. This distributes the resolution process across multiple stakeholders, reducing the financial burden on any single entity while maintaining delivery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the financial parameter landscape by offering multiple remediation options with different cost implications. Instead of a fixed resend approach, the system adapts financial responsibility based on the selected remediation action, optimizing the balance between delivery accuracy and financial cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional manual delivery verification is used, then simple operations are maintained, but misdeliveries go undetected and additional waiting time occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoiddelivery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary observer mechanism that bridges the carrier and recipient. Observers can report suspected misdeliveries, and the system validates these reports before initiating remediation. This intermediary layer maintains operational simplicity while significantly improving delivery accuracy through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual verification mechanisms with automated electronic reporting and validation systems. Observers can submit reports through digital interfaces, and the system automatically validates and determines remediation actions, eliminating the need for complex manual investigation processes while improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple remediation options are provided to the recipient, then recipient choice and satisfaction improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremediation flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the remediation process into distinct, manageable options presented to the recipient. Each remediation action is a separate, clearly defined choice with specific implications. This segmentation makes the system manageable despite offering multiple options, as each option follows a standardized evaluation and execution framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240311744A1Delivery loss mitigation
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240311744A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311744A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311744A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a method to mitigate delivery losses due to an item being delivered to an incorrect location. The method can receive from a first device associated with an observer, a notice that an item has been delivered to an incorrect location. In response to validating that the item has been delivered to the incorrect location, the method can determine a plurality of available remediation actions for the item that has been delivered to the incorrect location. The method can send to a second device associated with a recipient of the item, the plurality of available remediation actions, wherein each of the plurality of available remediation actions is selectable by the recipient of the item. In response to receiving, from the second device associated with the recipient of the item, a remediation action selection from the available remediation actions, the method can perform the remediation action selection.