Delivery Status Segmentation for Automated Refund Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In e-commerce, delivery delays or interruptions often occur without clear reasons being communicated to customers, and refund procedures are delayed due to unclear reasons for delivery issues.

Innovation Solution

An electronic apparatus manages delivery status by transmitting information to courier terminals, allowing for accurate identification of delivery issues such as wrong addresses or restricted areas, enabling immediate refunds and efficient delivery rescheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the courier holds the item during interrupted delivery, then the courier can potentially make a refund, but the refund procedure is delayed due to unclear delivery status information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund processing timeVSAvoiddelivery status information clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery status information is segmented into multiple discrete types (first type indicating buyer refusal, second type indicating delivery delay, third type indicating order cancellation). This segmentation allows the system to quickly identify and process the specific type of delivery issue, enabling immediate refund processing when applicable without waiting for further clarification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the courier terminal transmits delivery status information back to the electronic apparatus. This feedback loop ensures that the system receives real-time updates on delivery status, allowing it to automatically determine when a refund should be processed based on the transmitted information type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the delivery status information is not clearly categorized, then the system cannot automatically process refunds, but detailed categorization increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund processing efficiencyVSAvoiddelivery status management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery status information is divided into three distinct types with specific meanings. This segmentation enables automatic processing rules to be applied based on the type received, improving refund processing efficiency without requiring complex manual analysis of delivery status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of delivery status information from a single undifferentiated status to a multi-type parameter system. By defining specific types (first type for buyer refusal, second type for delivery delay, third type for cancellation), the system can automatically determine processing actions based on the parameter value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If the system processes all delivery interruptions as refund cases, then refunds are processed quickly, but false refunds are issued for deliverable items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund decision timeVSAvoidrefund accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery status information is segmented into different types that indicate different meanings. By segmenting the status types, the system can accurately determine which delivery interruptions warrant refunds (first and third types) and which require redelivery attempts (second type), preventing false refunds while maintaining quick processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The courier terminal provides feedback on the specific type of delivery status encountered. This feedback mechanism ensures that the electronic apparatus receives accurate information about the delivery interruption reason, enabling reliable automatic decisions about whether to process a refund or schedule redelivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11429978B2Delivery status management method and electronic apparatus performing the same
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 COUPANG CORP
  • US11429978B2 patent drawing
  • US11429978B2 patent drawing
  • US11429978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a delivery status management method performed by an electronic apparatus. The delivery status management method includes transmitting information associated with an item to a courier terminal, receiving information associated with a delivery progress status of the item from the courier terminal, and, when the information associated with the delivery progress status corresponds to a first type, performing a refund procedure for the item. According to the present disclosure, it is possible to provide a delivery status management method by which a refund caused by interruption of a delivery is not delayed and a refund procedure is performed quickly to a customer upon the interruption of the delivery.