Delmopinol Synthesis via Grignard Reaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing delmopinol, a compound used in oral health, face challenges with low yield, high cost, and the use of restricted or non-commercially available materials, making them inefficient and costly for industrial-scale production.

Innovation Solution

A new process involving the use of 1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene as a starting material, which allows for a more straightforward synthesis of delmopinol through a Grignard reaction with oxazolidin[2,3-c]morpholine, followed by catalytic hydrogenation, offering higher yields and improved purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current methods for producing delmopinol are used, then delmopinol can be synthesized, but the yield is low and the cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters by using 1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene as a starting material instead of the conventional 4-propylheptan-1-ol. This parameter change in the molecular structure leads to improved reaction efficiency, higher yield, and reduced manufacturing cost through the Grignard reaction pathway described in the patent

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the synthesis pathway by introducing an intermediate compound (1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene) that can be prepared separately and then used in the Grignard reaction. This segmentation allows for optimization of each step independently, improving overall productivity and reducing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If current methods for producing delmopinol are used, then delmopinol can be synthesized, but the number of steps is high and the process is complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of stepsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the double bond from the final product structure and incorporates it into the starting material (1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene). This extraction allows the Grignard reaction to proceed directly to the desired product without requiring additional reduction steps, thereby reducing the total number of synthesis steps and simplifying the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of synthesizing the saturated alcohol first and then introducing functional groups, the patent inverts the approach by starting with the unsaturated halide and using it directly in the Grignard reaction. This inversion of the conventional synthesis route reduces process complexity and number of steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of manufacture

If current methods for producing delmopinol are used, then delmopinol can be synthesized, but restricted or non-commercially available materials are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of materialsVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs 1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene as a starting material that can be prepared from commercially available compounds through a simple halogenation reaction. This replaces the need for restricted materials like -butyrolactone, using instead cheap, readily available reagents that can be disposed of or regenerated easily

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces the number of steps, increases yield, and simplifies the production of delmopinol, making it more cost-effective and suitable for industrial-scale manufacturing while achieving high purity.

Implementation Method 1

The invention provides a process for the manufacturing of delmopinol, which process comprises the use of 1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene. The invention further provides a process for manufacturing of delmopinol, which process comprises the use of 2-(3-(4-propylhept-3-en-1-yl)morpholino)ethan-1-ol.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrignard reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

A new process involving the use of 1-halo-4-propylhept-3-ene as a starting material, which allows for a more straightforward synthesis of delmopinol through a Grignard reaction with oxazolidin[2,3-c]morpholine, followed by catalytic hydrogenation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic hydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentEP3558951B1Method for the manufacturing of delmopinol
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 LUNDBECK PHARMA ITAL
  • EP3558951B1 patent drawing
  • EP3558951B1 patent drawing
  • EP3558951B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a new process for producing 2-(3-(4-propylheptyl)morpholino)ethan-1-ol with the INN name Delmopinol. The invention also relates to three key intermediates 1-chloro-4- propylhept-3-ene, 1-iodo-4-propylhept-3-ene and 2-(3-(4-propylhept-3-en-1-yl)morpholino)ethan-1-ol.