Delta Temperature Control for Catalytic Dehydrogenation Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Catalytic dehydrogenation units face inefficiencies in ramping up production with fresh catalyst, leading to catalyst coking and screen fouling, which delays reaching design production and reduces run length due to reliance on reactor inlet temperature (RIT) for reaction control.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that uses delta temperature (ΔT) for reaction control, calculating the optimal ΔT based on product yield estimates and adjusting reactor inlet temperature to maintain a desired differential temperature, thereby allowing faster ramp-up and better control over production and run length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If reactor inlet temperature (RIT) is used for reaction control during ramp-up, then production can be increased, but catalyst coking and screen fouling occur, reducing run length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction ramp-up rateVSAvoidcatalyst life/run length
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from reactor inlet temperature (RIT) to delta temperature (ΔT = reactor outlet temperature - reactor inlet temperature). By controlling ΔT rather than RIT directly, the system maintains optimal temperature differential across the catalyst bed, preventing coking and fouling while enabling faster ramp-up to design production rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring reactor outlet temperature and using it to adjust the reactor inlet temperature through the heater. The control system calculates the actual ΔT and compares it to the desired ΔT, automatically adjusting RIT to maintain the optimal temperature differential and prevent catalyst degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If reactor inlet temperature is increased to reach design production faster, then productivity improves, but catalyst coking occurs reducing run length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to reach design productionVSAvoidcatalyst coking
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control approach by using delta temperature (ΔT) as the controlled parameter instead of reactor inlet temperature (RIT) alone. This parameter change allows the system to achieve faster ramp-up rates without causing catalyst coking, as the ΔT control ensures optimal temperature distribution across the catalyst bed that prevents coke formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional RIT control is used, then operation is simple, but screen fouling occurs reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control simplicityVSAvoidscreen fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback control where the reactor outlet temperature measurement is fed back to automatically adjust the reactor inlet temperature. The control system calculates the delta temperature and automatically adjusts the heater output to maintain the desired ΔT, preventing screen fouling while maintaining operational simplicity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical temperature control with an automated control system that uses sensors, data processing, and automatic actuation. The system substitutes human-operated mechanical control with an automated feedback loop that continuously monitors outlet temperature and adjusts inlet temperature through the heater control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accelerated ramp-up of dehydrogenation units within a few catalyst cycles, maintaining optimal delta temperature profiles, reducing catalyst coking and screen fouling, and improving overall efficiency and production control.

Implementation Method 1

controlling a feed heater temperature... sending an output that causes an adjustment to a reactor inlet temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

catalytic dehydrogenation... dehydrogenation of paraffins to the corresponding olefin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

heat exchanger that exchanges heat with a reactor effluent to raise the reactant feed temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10953377B2Delta temperature control of catalytic dehydrogenation process reactors
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 UOP LLC
  • US10953377B2 patent drawing
  • US10953377B2 patent drawing
  • US10953377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chemical plant or a petrochemical plant or a refinery may include one or more pieces of equipment that process one or more input chemicals to create one or more products. For example, catalytic dehydrogenation can be used to convert paraffins to the corresponding olefin. A delta temperature controller may determine and control differential temperature across the reactor, and use a delta temperature to control a set point for a heater temperature controller. By doing so, the plant may ramp up a catalytic dehydrogenation unit faster and ensure it does not coke up the catalyst and/or foul a screens too quickly. Catalyst activity may be taken into account and allow the plant to have better control over production and run length of the unit.